Re: Trying to sumbit patches...

2007-04-17 Thread Tyson Whitehead
On Tue April 17 2007 11:28, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Now all received and applied; thanks for writing them and for > persevering with sending them! Thank you guys for the compiler. : ) > Procmail adds a header to any message which is more than 40k and doesn't > have a subject starting "darcs patch" (

Re: Trying to sumbit patches...

2007-04-17 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Tyson, On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:14:43AM -0400, Tyson Whitehead wrote: > I'm trying to submit the three patches promissed in trac #1265. Now all received and applied; thanks for writing them and for persevering with sending them! > 1P- Darcs wants to run through sendmail, but haskell.org (a

Re: Trying to sumbit patches...

2007-04-12 Thread Thorkil Naur
Hello, In the few cases where I have submitted darcs patches, I used darcs send -o some_filename.patch to create the patch as a local file, then passed that file to the appropriate receiver as an ordinary email attachment. This also leaves me with a copy of the patch to play around with. Be

Trying to sumbit patches...

2007-04-12 Thread Tyson Whitehead
I'm trying to submit the three patches promissed in trac #1265. It's been a couple of days now of one mailing problem after another. It's driving me quite insane, so please excuse my "argh" list! : ) 1P- Darcs wants to run through sendmail, but haskell.org (apparently) doesn't even open the s