On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:25:58PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 07:08:42PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> >
> > Sat Sep 20 18:52:38 GMT Daylight Time 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Tidy up the treatment of dead binders
> >
> > Furthermore, I removed the most troubling a
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 07:08:42PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> Sat Sep 20 18:52:38 GMT Daylight Time 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Tidy up the treatment of dead binders
>
> Furthermore, I removed the most troubling aspect altogether, where the "set"
> could map one Id to a *different* o
Ian,
You've probably forgotten this, but I finally got around to a tidy-up I've been
meaning to do for some time
Sat Sep 20 18:52:38 GMT Daylight Time 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Tidy up the treatment of dead binders
| From: Ian Lynagh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 10 February 2008 23:05
..
Ian Lynagh wrote:
I installed it and ghci is able to do arithmetic, at least.
Heh, that's my usual test for a working installer too :) You'd be
surprised how many things need to be working to get GHCi to print the value
of 2+2.
Cheers,
Simon
___
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:13:29AM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Ian Lynagh:
>
> >By the way, Manuel, is it supposed to remove the older version of
> >GHC I
> >had installed?
>
> You can have one version per branch.
Hmm, If I start off with your 6.8.3 installed:
$ ls -l /Library/
Ian Lynagh:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:08:04AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
So I think it should all work, and in any case Ian now has a Mac so
we can
verify all this.
I've just tried it (make framework-pkg), and modulo a couple of fixes
for installing with a DESTDIR (which I'll push once I'
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:08:04AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> So I think it should all work, and in any case Ian now has a Mac so we can
> verify all this.
I've just tried it (make framework-pkg), and modulo a couple of fixes
for installing with a DESTDIR (which I'll push once I've validated
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| > That means that there will be no Mac OS X installer packages for 6.10
| > either (it uses the bindist target as part of the build process). I
|
| Ooops, sorry, braino: bindist will work (and indeed, already does).
|
| What we won't fix is building from HC files, i.e
| > That means that there will be no Mac OS X installer packages for 6.10
| > either (it uses the bindist target as part of the build process). I
|
| Ooops, sorry, braino: bindist will work (and indeed, already does).
|
| What we won't fix is building from HC files, i.e. porting GHC to a new
| arc
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:48:03AM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Ian Lynagh:
> >Given the plan to change the build system, we've decided not to spend
> >time fixing bindist for the current build system, and thus not to
> >fix it
> >for the 6.10 release.
>
> That means that there will be
Ian Lynagh:
Given the plan to change the build system, we've decided not to spend
time fixing bindist for the current build system, and thus not to
fix it
for the 6.10 release.
That means that there will be no Mac OS X installer packages for 6.10
either (it uses the bindist target as part
machine took 29 before I
upgraded python (to a version that supports parallel testsuite) and ghc6
(from 6.6.1 to 6.8.2). I'm not sure which of these made most of the
difference.
I've closed a few bugs this week:
#2537: Missing LICENSE file (which was causing install to f
Hi all,
As anticipated last week, I spent a lot of this week working on the
build system. Mostly this was resurrecting UNIX binary distributions,
which now work (although there are doubtless some bits still missing).
Unfortunately, we don't normally know whereabouts in the tree we are,
e.g.
13 matches
Mail list logo
