do so.)
Thanks for contributing to GHC for PowerPC. A real help!
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Erik de Castro Lopo [mailto:er...@mega-nerd.com]
| Sent: 01 September 2012 09:09
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Subject: Re: FW: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.6.1 Release Candidate 1
|
| Simon,
|
| It
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Paolo can you merge this?
The following patch should probably also be merged to 7.6:
commit b4b78631890a4cd9cde1551de9a4440e7e750372
Author: Erik de Castro Lopo
Date: Thu Aug 23 20:39:47 2012 +1000
Fix for optimizer bug on linux-powerpc (#6156
7.6.1 Release Candidate 1
|
| Ian Lynagh wrote:
|
| >
| > We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.6.1:
| >
| > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.6.1-rc1/
| >
| > This includes the source tarball, installers for 32bit and 64bit
| > Windows, and bin
...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
| users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Christian Maeder
| Sent: 28 February 2011 15:09
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-us...@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.2 Release Candidate 2
|
| Am 28.02.2011 13:33, schrieb Christian Maeder:
| > Am 20.02.2011 22:16, schr
...@web.de [mailto:daniel.is.fisc...@web.de]
| Sent: 08 October 2010 19:55
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.0.1 Release Candidate 1
|
| On Friday 08 October 2010 18:52:05 you wrote:
| >
| > (Or you can wait for the next release candidate, end next week; but
| &g
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:54 +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> [Narrowing to cvs-ghc]
>
> So Axel says "we are doomed" and Manuel says "it's easy".
>
> I don't want GHC 6.10.2 to "fundamentally break" GtkHs.
>
> Let's resolve this.
We all discussed this today during the #ghc meeting. We think i
ell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Manuel M T Chakravarty
| Sent: 25 March 2009 01:17
| To: jutaro
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-us...@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 6.10.2 Release Candidate 1
|
| jutaro:
| > This is the first answer I got from the gtk2hs mailing li
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> I've pushed all I intend to for the beta/release-candidate.
Great, thanks!
> I assume you are about to fork the tree?
Yup, done.
Thanks
Ian
___
C
Ian
I've pushed all I intend to for the beta/release-candidate. I assume you are
about to fork the tree?
S
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:36 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> > if i could email patches to a buildbot address, with
> > buildbots applying and validating them, making
> > build/test results and full validate log available to
> > me, without applying these patches to the main repo,
> > i coud make f
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:36 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> if i could email patches to a buildbot address, with
> buildbots applying and validating them, making
> build/test results and full validate log available to
> me, without applying these patches to the main repo,
> i coud make faster progre
Hi Simon,
That's true. As Simon mentioned, the Trac people know this too
and plan to fix it. When they do, we'll use the 'Status' field (which
is the Right Thing but currently un-configurable) to track workflow.
We'll probably try to keep it very simple though.
see my reply to Simon's messa
Hi Claus
I'm catching up with my backlog!
| - the current tracking system is not set up efficiently: one cannot
| tell the state of play just by looking at a ticket, but has to delve
| into the comments instead; in brief, trac is still mostly tracking
| tickets, instead of tracking th
13 matches
Mail list logo
