Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:55 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > For a smoother transition away from base 3 (rather than just dropping it > > and breaking packages), we are just about to make hackage require upper > > bounds on the version of base and we're about to release an update to > > cabal-install

Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:33 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's the hackage regression results of removing base3-compat (and syb) > > from the HEAD. Starting with 1122 packages. > > Having a couple hundred packages b

Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:33 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the hackage regression results of removing base3-compat (and syb) > from the HEAD. Starting with 1122 packages. Having a couple hundred packages break is significantly more than we had at the 6.8 -> 6.10 transition. If it'

Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-02 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi all, Here's the hackage regression results of removing base3-compat (and syb) from the HEAD. Starting with 1122 packages. First, I removed 125 packages which directly or indirectly depended on base < 4: AERN-Net AERN-Real AERN-RnToRm ChasingBottoms Extra Finance-Quote-Yahoo Finance-Treasury