RE: Record wildcard patch

2007-07-04 Thread Augustsson, Lennart
y, June 18, 2007 2:03 PM To: Augustsson, Lennart; 'cvs-ghc@haskell.org' Subject: RE: Record wildcard patch Thanks! After some thought I concluded that it was better not to mix up the parent/child thing (which is used for import/export) with this field stuff. It gets a bit complicated:

RE: Record wildcard patch

2007-06-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
t. Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Augustsson, | Lennart | Sent: 13 June 2007 17:15 | To: 'cvs-ghc@haskell.org' | Subject: Record wildcard patch | | | Here's the record wildcard

Re: Record wildcard

2007-02-06 Thread Lennart Augustsson
t and HsRecordDotDot can be expanded during renaming. Would you like to add Malcolm's suggestion while you are at it? Simon | -Original Message- | From: Lennart Augustsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: 05 February 2007 21:55 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org

RE: Record wildcard

2007-02-06 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
e to add Malcolm's suggestion while you are at it? Simon | -Original Message- | From: Lennart Augustsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: 05 February 2007 21:55 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Record wildcard | | It could be my lack of knowledge. But

Re: Record wildcard

2007-02-05 Thread Lennart Augustsson
0:11 | To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org | Subject: Record wildcard | | Here's the complete record wildcard patch. | Even if you don't accept the (somewhat ugly) patch to implement the | wildcarding it | would be nice if you could apply all the minor ones (i.e., all but | the last). | | --

Re: Record wildcard

2007-02-05 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > Here's the complete record wildcard patch. > | > | Just to clarify, does ghc still accept the traditional record puns > | (in both expressions and patterns) from Haskell 1.3, and this patch > | merely augments puns

RE: Record wildcard

2007-02-05 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| > Here's the complete record wildcard patch. | | Just to clarify, does ghc still accept the traditional record puns (in | both expressions and patterns) from Haskell 1.3, and this patch merely | augments puns to include wildcards? Or are wildcarded-puns the only | kind that ghc now

Re: Record wildcard

2007-02-05 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Lennart Augustsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the complete record wildcard patch. Just to clarify, does ghc still accept the traditional record puns (in both expressions and patterns) from Haskell 1.3, and this patch merely augments puns to include wildcards? Or are wildc

RE: Record wildcard

2007-02-05 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
2007 00:11 | To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org | Subject: Record wildcard | | Here's the complete record wildcard patch. | Even if you don't accept the (somewhat ugly) patch to implement the | wildcarding it | would be nice if you could apply all the minor ones (i.e., all but | the last). | | -- Lenna