Re: Rebuild trickiness with new module loading

2011-04-27 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:46:59AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > > The test is broken if it depends on leftover object files. Somebody > should fix it! Done: 512097606e1d008a737c61b2c63b0189f0185097. Thanks Ian ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haske

Re: Rebuild trickiness with new module loading

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Marlow
On 14/04/2011 01:04, Edward Z. Yang wrote: I think a little care will need to be taken when rebuilding projects after the new module loading code: => rn.prog006(normal) 722 of 2717 [0, 0, 0] cd ./rename/prog006&& $MAKE -s --no-print-directory rn.prog006rn.prog006.run.stdout 2>rn.prog006.r

Rebuild trickiness with new module loading

2011-04-13 Thread Edward Z. Yang
I think a little care will need to be taken when rebuilding projects after the new module loading code: => rn.prog006(normal) 722 of 2717 [0, 0, 0] cd ./rename/prog006 && $MAKE -s --no-print-directory rn.prog006rn.prog006.run.stdout 2>rn.prog006.run.stderr Wrong exit code (expected 0 , act