On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:30:47PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Ian Lynagh wrote,
> >OK, I've made it get skipped in a fast testsuite run, so it won't cause
> >problems with the validate script. So, I think that clears up the last
> >issue with validate?
>
> Yes, at least on x86/MacOS ,
Ian Lynagh wrote,
OK, I've made it get skipped in a fast testsuite run, so it won't cause
problems with the validate script. So, I think that clears up the last
issue with validate?
Yes, at least on x86/MacOS , today's tree passes validate!
Are you going to announce it?
Manuel
__
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 08:04:41PM +0200, Pepe Iborra wrote:
>
> >break017 is strange - I was able to change the output merely by
>
> here btw) in a smaller test, with no luck. Sorry, but I've given up
> for the moment.
OK, I've made it get skipped in a fast testsuite run, so it won't cause
On 13/07/2007, at 22:33, Simon Marlow wrote:
Pepe Iborra wrote:
I will be looking at them during today and tomorrow.
print022 seems to be failing on some architectures but not in
others, if I recall correctly, and for break017 I want to verify
that the output is consistent among architect
.
That leaves Ian capably holding the GHC fort.
(Concerning the tests below, Ian you decide!)
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Manuel M T Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 12 July 2007 05:56
| To: Manuel M T Chakravarty; Simon Peyton-Jones; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: R
: Manuel M T Chakravarty; Simon Peyton-Jones; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: validate on x86/MacOS
|
| Ian Lynagh wrote,
| > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:54:28PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
| >> I talked with SimonM on irc, and we managed to eliminate all
| >> MacOS-sp
Sent: 12 July 2007 05:56
| To: Manuel M T Chakravarty; Simon Peyton-Jones; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: validate on x86/MacOS
|
| Ian Lynagh wrote,
| > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:54:28PM +1000, Manuel M T
Chakravarty wrote:
| >> I talked with SimonM on irc, and we managed to e
ly holding the GHC fort.
(Concerning the tests below, Ian you decide!)
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Manuel M T Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 12 July 2007 05:56
| To: Manuel M T Chakravarty; Simon Peyton-Jones; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: validate on x86/Mac
Ian Lynagh wrote,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:54:28PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
I talked with SimonM on irc, and we managed to eliminate all
MacOS-specific failures.
What does that leave?
Unexpected passes:
print022(ghci)
Unexpected failures:
break017(ghci)
Can you please
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:54:28PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>
> I talked with SimonM on irc, and we managed to eliminate all
> MacOS-specific failures.
What does that leave?
Can you please send the test outputs as well?
Thanks
Ian
___
C
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote,
I'll let Ian and/or Simon respond, since I don't have a
recent build. The loop we are in right now is:>
1. reduce validate failures to zero
2. publish guidelines (requiring zero failures)
I'm not sure we've completed (1) yet, so your qn is a good one.
I'll let Ian and/or Simon respond, since I don't have a recent build. The loop
we are in right now is:
1. reduce validate failures to zero
2. publish guidelines (requiring zero failures)
I'm not sure we've completed (1) yet, so your qn is a good one.
S
| -Original Message-
12 matches
Mail list logo
