Hi,
2011/6/9 Simon Peyton-Jones
> For #5227 I’ve just written some comments; I suggest we just derive
> Generic up to 7-tuples. Can you try that?
>
Done.
Cheers,
Pedro
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/list
For #5227 I've just written some comments; I suggest we just derive Generic up
to 7-tuples. Can you try that?
For #5224, I've also written a comment. I think I know what to do, but I think
it'd be a bit of work for you to figure out how to do it. I'll get to it
S
From: José Pedro Magalhães [
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:37:39PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
> 2010/3/30 David Waern :
> > 2010/3/22 David Waern :
> >> OK, that's great. I'll see if I can come up with some patches at a later
> >> time.
> >
> > Attached is a patch that moves the instances from ghc-syb into GHC. It
> > passed vali
2010/3/30 David Waern :
> 2010/3/22 David Waern :
>> OK, that's great. I'll see if I can come up with some patches at a later
>> time.
>>
>> David
>>
>
> Attached is a patch that moves the instances from ghc-syb into GHC. It
> passed validation today.
>
> David
This got stuck in the moderation qu
2010/3/28 Thomas Schilling :
> The only part of ghc-syb that depends on syb is the GHC.SYB.Utils module. I
> moved that into a separate package. ghc-syb-0.2 now only depends on base and
> the ghc package. The new package is ghc-syb-utils-0.2.
Thanks Thomas but since I want to use the instance
The only part of ghc-syb that depends on syb is the GHC.SYB.Utils module. I
moved that into a separate package. ghc-syb-0.2 now only depends on base and
the ghc package. The new package is ghc-syb-utils-0.2.
HTH
On 28 Mar 2010, at 16:10, David Waern wrote:
> 2010/3/22 Thomas Schilling :
>>
2010/3/22 Thomas Schilling :
> I wonder if the ghc-syb package really needs to depend on syb. Just
> data may be enough if we split it up. How would you make use of syb
> without depending on the syb package?
I would copy the parts I need. If it was possible to depend on syb I'd
prefer that of c
I wonder if the ghc-syb package really needs to depend on syb. Just
data may be enough if we split it up. How would you make use of syb
without depending on the syb package?
On 22 March 2010 11:08, David Waern wrote:
> 2010/3/22 Simon Peyton-Jones :
>> | We've discussed support for generic prog
2010/3/22 Simon Peyton-Jones :
> | We've discussed support for generic programming of the GHC AST before.
> | Is there any chance we could move further on this topic by providing
> | Data and Typeable instances for HsSyn either directly in the ghc
> | package or in a boot library?
>
> I'm not again
| We've discussed support for generic programming of the GHC AST before.
| Is there any chance we could move further on this topic by providing
| Data and Typeable instances for HsSyn either directly in the ghc
| package or in a boot library?
I'm not against that. If we do it, we should do it in
10 matches
Mail list logo
