Re: Codegen changes

2008-10-21 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:25:35AM -0400, John Dias wrote: > Just ran validate. Is the following a currently acceptable result Yes, these tests randomly sometimes fail. Simon M, I think you looked into this a while ago - do you know what's going on with these tests? > Unexpected failures: >b

RE: Codegen changes

2008-10-21 Thread John Dias
Just ran validate. Is the following a currently acceptable result, or do I have something to fix over here before I push? OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Tue Oct 21 08:01:49 EDT 2008 2232 total tests, which gave rise to 8384 test cases, of which 0 caused framework failures

RE: Codegen changes

2008-10-20 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > | > Any objections? | | None from me! Good -- you're probably the key player here. | | > The changes are mostly in cmm/ and codeGen/. | | Currently we aren't making unnecessary changes in those directories, | e.g. fixing w

Re: Codegen changes

2008-10-19 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > Any objections? None from me! > The changes are mostly in cmm/ and codeGen/. Currently we aren't making unnecessary changes in those directories, e.g. fixing warnings or monadifying code, due to the work happening in the br