Andy,
Galois intends to setup a virtual machine that runs MacOS, for this
purpose.
We are waiting, however for 10.5 before we buy the machine.
Great - thanks Galois! :)
Manuel
On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
In that context, AFAIK there is no nightly MacOS build
Galois intends to setup a virtual machine that runs MacOS, for this
purpose.
We are waiting, however for 10.5 before we buy the machine.
AndyG
On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote,
The current plan is to have a "last good build" snapshot Darcs
Hi Ian,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
cd libraries
darcs get http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/ndp
cd ..
autoreconf
Are there docs somewhere that still tell you to run autoreconf?
sh boot
This step is new and, of course, I skipped it on first try. The README
mentions it but why is it nec
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote,
The current plan is to have a "last good build" snapshot Darcs repo. If you
pull from that, you'll know that Buildbot managed to build from start to
finish without problems.
In that context, AFAIK there is no nightly MacOS build at the moment.
Unfortunately, we have
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:38:36PM +1000, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
> > The parse error is because ndp uses some ghc extensions which Haddock
> > doesn't understand. But why is Haddock run at all here? IMO, a separate
> > make doc s
Hi Roman,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:38:36PM +1000, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
>
> today, I tried to build the ghc-ndp branch from a fresh tree after two
> weeks off. Ultimately, it sort of worked, but not without some pain.
> I'll describe what I did and the problems I've encountered in the ho
Hi Roman, thanks for the feedback. Some responses below.
Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
1. Is there a way to get a clean tree? Both make clean and make
distclean fail to clean any subdirectories (compiler, rts) and
libraries. This is not really what I expect (and not what they used to
do, IIRC).
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
The current plan is to have a "last good build" snapshot Darcs repo. If you
pull from that, you'll know that Buildbot managed to build from start to finish without
problems.
FWIW, none of the problems I've encountered would have been caught by
BuildBot, I think. T
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
|configure
|
| Works, but the first line of output is strange:
|
| checking for GHC version date... darcs: getFdStatus: invalid argument
| (Bad file descriptor)
This happens to me on Windows (you don't say which platform you are on), and
its always because I'm gett
| Finally, I'd like to point out that the recent changes to the build
| system have caused and continue to cause a lot of problems for us. I
| understand that refactoring the build system is a worthwhile task
| but it would be really great if it was less disruptive.
Yes, agreed. As you know we've
|configure
|
| Works, but the first line of output is strange:
|
| checking for GHC version date... darcs: getFdStatus: invalid argument
| (Bad file descriptor)
This happens to me on Windows (you don't say which platform you are on), and
its always because I'm getting the Windows/System32 sor
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:38:36PM +1000, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
> The parse error is because ndp uses some ghc extensions which Haddock
> doesn't understand. But why is Haddock run at all here? IMO, a separate
> make doc step is preferable to running it automatically. In any case, I
> assume
12 matches
Mail list logo
