On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:00:30PM +0100, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
>
> I'm compiling haddock HEAD using GHC Paths 1.0.5. To compile haddock I
> required two patches, which I've attached to this message, and darcs
> sent as well.
Thanks; I've fixed these.
Thanks
Ian
___
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:24:08PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Sigh, I did wonder if this might happen. We rely on some undocumented
> behaviour in windres to get it to not mangle the arguments it gets
> passed (I had to read the source), and I guess they changed it. Can
> someone make a tick
: 11 September 2008 1:45 pm
To: Mitchell, Neil
Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org; Duncan Coutts
Subject: Re: Failure to build Haddock with GHC HEAD on Windows
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:00:30 +0900, Mitchell, Neil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using a version of GHC HEAD on Windows XP, built in the
las
8 1:45 pm
> To: Mitchell, Neil
> Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org; Duncan Coutts
> Subject: Re: Failure to build Haddock with GHC HEAD on Windows
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:00:30 +0900, Mitchell, Neil
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Using a version of GHC HEA
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:00:30 +0900, Mitchell, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a version of GHC HEAD on Windows XP, built in the last hour, I get
> a compilation failure when building haddock. It's possible this is a
> Cabal issue, so I've cc'd Duncan.
>
> (snip)
>
> [24 of 24] Compilin
Hi,
Using a version of GHC HEAD on Windows XP, built in the last hour, I get
a compilation failure when building haddock. It's possible this is a
Cabal issue, so I've cc'd Duncan.
I'm compiling haddock HEAD using GHC Paths 1.0.5. To compile haddock I
required two patches, which I've attached to t
