Re: CPP "DEBUG" and validate

2008-06-02 Thread Simon Marlow
c Dupree | Sent: 02 June 2008 02:09 | To: BuildBot Collator | Subject: CPP "DEBUG" and validate | | This seems to be the most common way that validate is accidentally | broken, these days -- not testing with both DEBUG defined and undefined. | Rather than double the testing time, I sugges

RE: CPP "DEBUG" and validate

2008-06-02 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Good idea! I've been caught by this too Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isaac Dupree | Sent: 02 June 2008 02:09 | To: BuildBot Collator | Subject: CPP "DEBUG" and validate | | This seems to be the most common wa

Re: CPP "DEBUG" and validate

2008-06-01 Thread Isaac Dupree
Isaac Dupree wrote: This seems to be the most common way that validate is accidentally broken, these days -- not testing with both DEBUG defined and undefined. or maybe I'm wrong. Not sure -- I haven't been compiling GHC for a few months before now. _

CPP "DEBUG" and validate

2008-06-01 Thread Isaac Dupree
This seems to be the most common way that validate is accidentally broken, these days -- not testing with both DEBUG defined and undefined. Rather than double the testing time, I suggest validate is modified to either: - Compile one of stage1 and stage2 with DEBUG and the other without. - But