On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:56:48 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I think it's a bit late to be putting this patch into 7.4.1 at this
> stage, sorry. Since it doesn't affect any APIs there's the possibility
> of putting it into 7.4.2, as long as we review it carefully for any
> possible collateral dam
On 31/01/2012 01:10, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:21:37 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote:
Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an
unrelated bug (ticket #5824, David, your feedback would be greatly
a
Looks good. Ian would you be OK with including this patch with 7.4?
(see email below).
Cheers,
David.
On 30 January 2012 17:10, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:21:37 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
>> linker. While I spen
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:21:37 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
> linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an
> unrelated bug (ticket #5824, David, your feedback would be greatly
> appreciated here), the linker is lo
Great work!
OK added some comments to $5824. Will try to take a look at the fence
stuff soon.
Cheers,
David
On 29 January 2012 09:21, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
> linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an
> unr
Ben,
big congratulations! And thanks a lot for your hard work on this. This
is indeed really great!
I'm looking at your patch for #5824 and will have few questions in
another email. I hope once this is solved I'll rerun your GHC tree
thorough my testing board here...
Thanks!
Karel
On 01/
On 29/01/2012 17:21, Ben Gamari wrote:
Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an
unrelated bug (ticket #5824, David, your feedback would be greatly
appreciated here), the linker is looking quite good,
Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM
linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an
unrelated bug (ticket #5824, David, your feedback would be greatly
appreciated here), the linker is looking quite good,
$ inplace/lib/ghc-stage2 -B/opt/ghc/ghc/gh
On 10/22/11 06:24 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:58:18 +0200, Karel Gardas
wrote:
Hi Ben,
first of all, thank you very much for your progress. No, I don't see
crash, but in fact infinite loop. As far as I understand the linker
message '..linking...done' is printed when all the r
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:58:18 +0200, Karel Gardas
wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> first of all, thank you very much for your progress. No, I don't see
> crash, but in fact infinite loop. As far as I understand the linker
> message '..linking...done' is printed when all the relocations are
> processed --
comparison with what ARM suggest in
their ELF doc...
Thanks!
Karel
On 10/21/11 07:51 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
After much debugging, I've put up a new version of my ARM linker support
patchset on Github[1]. While the relocation code seems to work insofar
as it gets past linking and begins running
After much debugging, I've put up a new version of my ARM linker support
patchset on Github[1]. While the relocation code seems to work insofar
as it gets past linking and begins running code without SIGILL or
SIGSEGV, clearly something is amiss,
$ inplace/bin/ghc-stage2 -Binplac
12 matches
Mail list logo
