On June 28, 2011 18:01:52 Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
> Ryan Newton wrote:
> > I'd also be happy to hear other proposals for API changes and additions.
>
> As I say below, I don't understand why we can't use ByteString. There
> are (or should be) rather fast decodings of all the popular primitive
>
; should get through while other large messages shouldn't.
Ah, that's was my fault. I used the --subject option for darcs send to
specify my own subject.
-Tyson
--
Tyson Whitehead (-twhitehe at uwo.ca -- MC-)
Computer Engineer Dept. of Applied Mathematics
Tue Apr 10 10:03:08 EDT 2007 Tyson Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Differentiate between use of fail and failure of code (i.e., an exception
is thrown)
Tue Apr 10 10:06:53 EDT 2007 Tyson Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add a test for use of fail for trac #1265
-BEGIN PGP SI
h, and It seems a bit
strange as it means subscribers can't comment on them until they have already
been accepted. So, just in case, let it be known: the rest of it is there.
Thanks! -Tyson
--
Tyson Whitehead (-twhitehe at uwo.ca -- MC-)
Computer Engineer Dep
Tue Apr 10 10:18:57 EDT 2007 Tyson Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Report fail string before passing control through to underlying fail in Q
monad (otherwise it gets lost in GHC's IOEnv) for trac #1265
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Report fail st
