On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 00:08 +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:36 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > On 03/01/10 23:19, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > > At that point I feel like this patch would be worth committing, minus
> > > the libffi/ghc.mk hack and po
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:36 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 03/01/10 23:19, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > At that point I feel like this patch would be worth committing, minus
> > the libffi/ghc.mk hack and possibly name changes, so I'm even more eager
> > to hear about the a
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 00:03 +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:20 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 12:09 +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> >
> > > - Is there a plan to deal with the ldconfig cache on UNIX systems? As
> > >
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 14:20 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 12:09 +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
>
> > - Is there a plan to deal with the ldconfig cache on UNIX systems? As
> > things are now, I had to manually add all the package directories
> > under /
Hello guys,
As the subject says I've been hacking to get the shared libraries code
of GHC 6.12.1 to work on FreeBSD. This patch is mere plumbing to get
the code to treat FreeBSD just the same as Linux. I expected FreeBSD to
follow the same ELF conventions than Linux and as far as I can
