I am just curious. What had to be changed in LLVM? Could it be useful
for other projects using LLVM?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:55 AM, David Terei wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over the last 6 months I've been working on a new code generator for GHC
> which targets the LLVM compiler infrastructure. Most
Marlow wrote:
> On 04/11/2009 06:48, Krasimir Angelov wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
>>>
>>> The main sticking point with using dlopen() exclusively, as Duncan
>>> pointed
>>> out, is that we need to link plain .
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> The main sticking point with using dlopen() exclusively, as Duncan pointed
> out, is that we need to link plain .o files in GHCi.
Wouldn't the dynamic linking slow down the linking? This will
eliminate the advantage of the faster loading that
I also didn't get any comment for the patch so maybe the readline port
is not supported anymore. I could ask in the main readline development
list. I created the patch with another tool and I didn't check whether
it works with the Unix tools. I will make another patch next week. I
will be away in t
There is a native port of readline to Windows from gnuwi32 here:
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/readline.htm
It is rather flaky but I did some fixes in the C library and now it
works very well. The Haskell binding also just works. You can find the
patch here:
http://sourceforge.net/tra
