On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
One piece of utility code that I find myself writing over and over again is
the pointwise Num instance for tuples, i.e.
For my taste, writing
2 :: (Int, Integer)
abs (x,y)
should yield a compiler error and the compiler should not try to in
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just would like to point out that there is nothing inherently bad about
> what GHC calls ``orphan instances''.
>
> From a code structuring point of view,
> I frequently ``consider orphan'' instances
> useful for separation of concerns.
The problem
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Henning,
Friday, May 23, 2008, 8:31:24 PM, you wrote:
would guarantee speed in every case. Or I can SPECIALISE the function,
then the function will only be called, but with polymorphism overhead
eliminated. This would only work for a restrict
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Henning Thielemann wrote:
An even more advanced tool could show differences between two Core listings.
Say I have a program which runs too slow. But if I change a small detail it
runs significantly faster - I want to know, how did my change in the Haskell
file modified
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Don,
Just a quick announcement, I've uploaded to hackage 'ghc-core' , a
wrapper over ghc for displaying the optimised core and assembly language
ghc produces from your programs.
This is cool, but it still lags behind the facilities found in yhc-
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Don,
Just a quick announcement, I've uploaded to hackage 'ghc-core' , a
wrapper over ghc for displaying the optimised core and assembly language
ghc produces from your programs.
This is cool, but it still lags behind the facilities found in yhc-
