On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> The third is helpful for the new type inference engine, and makes the code
> clearer too.
Why does it help? And how?
Cheers! =)
--
Felipe.
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
ht
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:55:08AM +1100, David Terei wrote:
> http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~davidt/downloads/llvm-ghc.patch
I glanced over your patch and it seems you have broken LLVM's
backend. I'm not a LLVM expert by no means, but if GHC's needs
were implemented as a subtarget, wouldn't there b
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:19:50PM -0800, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> View patch online:
> http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20100201002420-1287e-da7031609e7c01b4ed22ba231a434894bb4f.gz
There's a small typo "oringal" on the second note, "Specialise
original body".
--
Felipe.
__
Hello!
I've just subscribed to cvs-ghc because I saw Simon's proposal on
reddit[1] about the Immix GC. After reading the paper, I would like to
know if it is feasible to consider implementing it in a GSoC project.
Some background about me:
- I am not familiar with GHC's code, although I'm very co
