Re: GCC, Mac OS X & the future

2011-07-01 Thread Dan Knapp
directives. If you define CC_FLAVOR as a string, is > there an easy way to do the conditional compilation we need in the rts? You are correct, there's not. I hadn't thought that through. Okay, I'll go ahead and modify my stuff accordingly. -- Dan Knapp "

Re: GCC, Mac OS X & the future

2011-07-01 Thread Dan Knapp
gt;>> header files, so that probably needs some #ifdefery somewhere for >>>>>>>>> llvm-gcc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it's in 'StgCRun.c'.   Ok, and how about on i386 (or do you want >>>>>>>> to phase that a

GCC, Mac OS X & the future

2011-06-28 Thread Dan Knapp
x27;s absolutely the only issue. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: > On 28/06/2011, at 13:20, Dan Knapp wrote: > >> The other issue is that cpp, whether the llvm-gcc version or the clang >> version, does not work for us.  Only gcc cpp fills our

Re: GCC, Mac OS X & the future

2011-06-28 Thread Dan Knapp
>>> over. Doesn't exist under that name on Lion. You have to reference it by its full name which includes the architecture. And I obviously have no information on this score, but I could see llvm-gcc going away before OS X 10.8 Asian Leopard Cat (or whatever), given that it i