indeed!
when can we anticipate this rollout!
also: props to all for such a rapid concensus on this topic! :)
-carter
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Niklas Larsson wrote:
> Sounds good, even if one wants to receive everything it's much easier
> to robustly filter the incoming mail when it c
Cool info!
Would love to see that report if you can dig it up :)
-Carter
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> | In my opinion we should only implement optimizations in Hoopl that
> | LLVM cannot do due to lack high-level information that we might have
> | gotten rid of