pgj-freebsd-amd64-stable (amd64 FreeBSD STABLE), build 372
Build succeeded
Details:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj-freebsd-amd64-stable/372.html
git clone| Success
create mk/build.mk | Success
get subrepos | Success
repo versions| Success
setting v
pgj-freebsd-i386-stable (x86 FreeBSD STABLE), build 355
Build succeeded
Details:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj-freebsd-i386-stable/355.html
git clone| Success
create mk/build.mk | Success
get subrepos | Success
repo versions| Success
setting versi
pgj (x86 FreeBSD HEAD), build 492
Build succeeded
Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj/492.html
git clone| Success
create mk/build.mk | Success
get subrepos | Success
repo versions| Success
setting version date | Success
booting | Su
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:33:06PM -0700, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if just
> >
> >-mmacosx-version-min=10.5
> >
> > would (a) produce a GHC that works on 10.5, and (b) work on recent Macs
> > too. Unfortunately, I can't test (a). Also, even if it does work now, I
> > wouldn't
>
> I don't know if just
>
>-mmacosx-version-min=10.5
>
> would (a) produce a GHC that works on 10.5, and (b) work on recent Macs
> too. Unfortunately, I can't test (a). Also, even if it does work now, I
> wouldn't be surprised if it broke in the near future.
>
Yes, it should. I was planning o
pgj2 (amd64 FreeBSD HEAD), build 490
Build failed
Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj2/490.html
git clone | Success
create mk/build.mk | Success
get subrepos | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 2)
Build failed
Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pg
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/6361b7fa141ce0c0120e9e8ff31344c419c13bed
>---
commit 6361b7fa141ce0c0120e9e8ff31344c419c13bed
Author: Ian Lynagh
Dat
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Tue Oct 4 18:00:02 BST 2011.
checking out new source t
Build description = STABLE on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Tue Oct 4 18:10:01 BST 2011.
checking out new so
tn23 (x86 OSX HEAD), build 447
Build failed
Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/tn23/447.html
git clone | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 5)
Build failed
Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/tn23/447.html
dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libcrypto.0.9.8.dyl
2011/10/4 Simon Peyton-Jones :
> What about changes that are directly forced by (typcially) changes to HsSyn,
> and hence immediately break the GHC HEAD build if not done? Do we commit
> directly to the 'master' branch of the Haddock repo for those?
Yep, just continue like you do for those!
D
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:50 -0700, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>
> > In the future, we should try get the GHC build to work as far back as
> > 10.5 for 32-bit builds.
>
> Is there anything that the upstream ghc devs need to fix or be awar
On 4 October 2011 06:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Ah, thats an idea. I should try to force the stage1 and stage2 compiler
> to go via LLVM and then see how the time is:
>
> - via NCG
> - via LLVM before my changes
> - via LLVM after my changes
>
Yes that will work and be a large scale test
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/cac1aa29fb728abb9aa97c8f0f94d299da4a800c
>---
commit cac1aa29fb728abb9aa97c8f0f94d299da4a800c
Author: Daniel Fischer
Karel Gardas wrote:
> > Does anyone have a suggestion as an appropriate test for this?
>
> If you are successful in your hacking, then GHC bootstrap on ARM should
> be faster. I'm not able to give you a login on my pandaboard dedicated
> to ARM/GHC hacking, but in about two weeks my board shoul
On 10/ 4/11 02:53 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I'm working on some changes (suggested by David Terei) to the LLVM
backend that I hope will improve compile times when going via LLVM.
Something like that is more than welcome on slow hosts which are using
LLVM -- i.e. GHC/ARM combination comes
Hi all,
I'm working on some changes (suggested by David Terei) to the LLVM
backend that I hope will improve compile times when going via LLVM.
Does anyone have a suggestion as an appropriate test for this?
Cheers,
Erik
--
--
Er
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/ec436fefbc3e35fc2e558184b4b0b98cec78eeb6
>---
commit ec436fefbc3e35fc2e558184b4b0b98cec78eeb6
Author: Simon Peyton Jo
New patches in /srv/darcs/git-mirrors/Win32
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
New patches in /srv/darcs/git-mirrors/containers
commit 1ad907a244e163191cdc0679083c72d2309b1426
Author: Johan Tibell
Date: Mon Oct 3 21:10:40 2011 -0700
Bump version number to 0.4.2.0
commit cd1124133672df73d18cc2cbd85ce5fc706fa7ec
Author: Johan Tibell
Date: Mon Oct 3 21:08:32 2011 -
Okay, so I took a stab at the build system and getting the analysis
plugin at least building, and the results are in this commit:
https://github.com/thoughtpolice/ghc/commit/c30b32fc98a78e322d872b82bed670ee4627ecf0
I'm working on pushing a version that moves most of the logic in this
commit direc
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:50 -0700, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> Here's where I am:
>
> Today I managed to build a 32-bit version HP 2011.3.0.0 (based on GHC 7.0.4
> from GHC central). This installs and runs on 10.6 and 10.7 (with some tweaks
> applied to the ghc script). It will not run on 10.5 because
simonmar-win32-stable (x86 Windows STABLE), build 335
Build succeeded
Details:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/simonmar-win32-stable/335.html
git clone| Success
create mk/build.mk | Success
get subrepos | Success
repo versions| Success
setting version d
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/9fc03d37c67098ab9dfa9403ff2c94e640074a76
>---
commit 9fc03d37c67098ab9dfa9403ff2c94e640074a76
Author: Simon Peyton Jo
| Is the result of dataToTag unique globally, or just per data type? Is
| there any assumption on the range or order?
Per data type. The tags come out 0,1,2... in the same order that you declared
the constructors in the data type declaration.
| For tagToEnum, does the following isomorphism hold
What about changes that are directly forced by (typcially) changes to HsSyn,
and hence immediately break the GHC HEAD build if not done? Do we commit
directly to the 'master' branch of the Haddock repo for those?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:c
26 matches
Mail list logo