Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Thu Sep 15 18:00:01 BST 2011.
checking out new source
Build description = STABLE on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Thu Sep 15 18:10:01 BST 2011.
checking out new s
Do you have this patch? It deals with most of them. I'm getting validate clean
except for the improved perf on T4801 -- Ian could you deal with that one?
Simon
commit ab0d2095393ac7d82a18e67cd90fe7f2bddd9a8a
Author: Simon Peyton Jones
Date: Wed Sep 14 17:21:57 2011 +0100
Improved debug
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/e610292338d5f9ae598e6ca0a5d7f665f00158af
>---
commit e610292338d5f9ae598e6ca0a5d7f665f00158af
Author: Ian Lynagh
Dat
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/54ba45317a213ca4bf9d3bd26ecacfce776ce695
>---
commit 54ba45317a213ca4bf9d3bd26ecacfce776ce695
Merge: e610292... b2153
On Thursday 15 September 2011, 16:57:28, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:30:53PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > So the test results are probably ok, but I'm a little concerned that
> > some of these tests are not testing what they were before.
> >
> > Ian, do you have outstanding pa
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:30:53PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> So the test results are probably ok, but I'm a little concerned that
> some of these tests are not testing what they were before.
>
> Ian, do you have outstanding patches to update the output for these?
I don't, but I can take a l
That was really directed at Max, sorry for the confusion.
Cheers,
Simon
On 15/09/2011 15:14, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Thanks for the tip, but the failure was not due to a change of mine, but in a
tree that I got when I pulled from haskell.org (after several days not pulling)
— .
Thanks for the tip, but the failure was not due to a change of mine, but in a
tree that I got when I pulled from haskell.org (after several days not pulling)
— . So, I don't really have a before and after state.
Manuel
Simon Marlow:
> So the max_bytes_used metric is more random than the other
On 15/09/2011 01:16, GHC Build Reports wrote:
Unexpected failures:
codeGen/should_runcgrun059 [bad exit code]
(hpc,optasm,profasm,threaded2,dyn,profthreaded,optllvm)
deriving/should_fail T2701 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
driver5313 [bad ex
So the max_bytes_used metric is more random than the others. It
measures the peak residency (and it's badly named, too) encountered by
the GC. So if you have a program that has a spiky memory profile, as
many programs do, then small changes in the time at which a GC strikes
can have a large i
New patches in /srv/darcs/git-mirrors/Win32
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
New patches in /srv/darcs/git-mirrors/containers
commit ebd6d2ddf6b4a622cec172df9038768ca3409d7b
Author: Milan Straka
Date: Sun Sep 11 18:58:17 2011 +0200
Changing version of base dependency to < 5.
The original was < 6.
The dependency base >= 4.2 && base < 5 seems weird
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/b215384ba29f2ab85bf4655881fb78ff1161c975
>---
commit b215384ba29f2ab85bf4655881fb78ff1161c975
Author: Simon Peyton Jo
14 matches
Mail list logo
