[nightly] 14-May-2011 build of STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx)

2011-05-14 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sat May 14 18:10:01 BST 2011. checking out new source tree

pgj-freebsd-amd64-stable (amd64 FreeBSD STABLE), build 242, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
pgj-freebsd-amd64-stable (amd64 FreeBSD STABLE), build 242 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj-freebsd-amd64-stable/242.html git clone| Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Success setting version date | Success booting

pgj-freebsd-i386-stable (x86 FreeBSD STABLE), build 225, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
pgj-freebsd-i386-stable (x86 FreeBSD STABLE), build 225 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj-freebsd-i386-stable/225.html git clone| Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Success setting version date | Success booting

pgj2 (amd64 FreeBSD HEAD), build 360, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
pgj2 (amd64 FreeBSD HEAD), build 360 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj2/360.html git clone| Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Success setting version date | Success booting | Success configuring | S

pgj (x86 FreeBSD HEAD), build 362, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
pgj (x86 FreeBSD HEAD), build 362 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj/362.html git clone| Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Success setting version date | Success booting | Success configuring | Succe

tn23 (x86 OSX HEAD), build 338, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
tn23 (x86 OSX HEAD), build 338 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/tn23/338.html git clone | Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 2) Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/tn23/338

[nightly] 14-May-2011 build of STABLE on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)

2011-05-14 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = STABLE on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx) Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE-cam-04-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-04-unx Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Sat May 14 18:10:01 BST 2011. checking out new s

Re: [PATCH] Better encoding/decoding for GHC

2011-05-14 Thread Max Bolingbroke
On 11 May 2011 13:36, Max Bolingbroke wrote: > I thought you were arguing against choice 1 and in favour of 2 in your > initial message? I've pushed my implementation pretty much as it was at the beginning of this thread to master so it can go into 7.2. Please let me know of any problems you enco

kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head (x86 Solaris HEAD), build 232, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head (x86 Solaris HEAD), build 232 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head/232.html git clone | Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 2) Build failed Details:

Unsafe foreign calls are NOT fat machine instructions (yet)

2011-05-14 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Hello all, I've just pinned down a nasty bug in the new code generator (not my code, whoo!) that was tickled by my aggressive optimization pass. In the old code generator (CgUtils.hs), we have the following section for caller saves: callerSaves :: GlobalReg -> Bool #ifdef CALLER_SAVES_B

sparky-unreg (Sparc Solaris unreg HEAD), build 120, Failure

2011-05-14 Thread Builder
sparky-unreg (Sparc Solaris unreg HEAD), build 120 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/sparky-unreg/120.html git clone | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 9) Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/sparky-unreg/120.html ld.so.1: git: fatal: rel

[nightly] 14-May-2011 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx)

2011-05-14 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sat May 14 18:00:01 BST 2011. checking out new source tree

[nightly] 14-May-2011 build of HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx)

2011-05-14 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx) Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Sat May 14 18:00:01 BST 2011. checking out new source

Re: Another new code generator status report

2011-05-14 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Oh yeah, sorry ^_^ Columns: 1. Percent size change of binary 2. Size of the old binary 3. Delta between old binary and new binary Where "old" is "compiled with old codegen" and vice versa. Thus, >    0.2699   7024   1896 ./stranal/should_run/strun001.o means that strun001.o was 7kb when compile

Another new code generator status report

2011-05-14 Thread Edward Z. Yang
I spent some time last evening and today fixing some more low hanging fruit (still waiting for a big enough chunk of free time to tackle the spill and stack layout rewrites), and here are the latest statistics: 0.2558 5160 1320 ./deSugar/should_compile/ds018.o 0.2565 7204 1848 ./ga

Should -ddump-to-file append or overwrite?

2011-05-14 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Currently, -ddump-to-file appends to an existing file. This is pretty confusing for me, if I wanted to get a new set of information, because now I have to delete any dump files before I take more data, or I need to manually separate out the runs (which, by the way, are not demarcated.) If no one

Re: Build is broken

2011-05-14 Thread Edward Z. Yang
It's tough to tell with just the commit log. Can you pop open gitk and take a look? (maybe take a screen shot and share.) Edward Excerpts from Ben Lippmeier's message of Sat May 14 04:37:09 -0400 2011: > > On 13/05/2011, at 8:56 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote: > > > Hey Ben, > > > > It looks like y

Re: Build is broken

2011-05-14 Thread Ben Lippmeier
On 13/05/2011, at 8:56 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote: > Hey Ben, > > It looks like you broke the build for other people in > 5bfa6a6382a4e4b949d333b1996065e9bcfacb18. Urgh, sorry. It looks like I tripped over an #ifdef mine. I tried to validate Erik's patch just now but I've messed up my git repo