pgj2 (amd64 FreeBSD HEAD), build 282, Success

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
pgj2 (amd64 FreeBSD HEAD), build 282 Build succeeded Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj2/282.html darcs checkout| Success create mk/build.mk| Success get subrepos | Success repo versions | Success setting version date | Succ

pgj (x86 FreeBSD HEAD), build 284, Success

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
pgj (x86 FreeBSD HEAD), build 284 Build succeeded Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/pgj/284.html darcs checkout| Success create mk/build.mk| Success get subrepos | Success repo versions | Success setting version date | Success

tn23 (x86 OSX HEAD), build 268, Failure

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
tn23 (x86 OSX HEAD), build 268 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/tn23/268.html darcs checkout | Success create mk/build.mk | Success get subrepos | Success repo versions| Success setting version date | Success booting | Success

kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head (x86 Solaris HEAD), build 142, Success

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head (x86 Solaris HEAD), build 142 Build succeeded Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/kgardas-opensolaris-x86-head/142.html darcs checkout| Success create mk/build.mk| Success get subrepos | Success repo versions

Re: Mac OS X: build failure or my fault?

2011-02-25 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:31:32AM +, Dimitrios Vytiniotis wrote: > Hi, in Mac OS X 10.5.8, after darcs-all pull, perl boot, ./configure, make > clean (I had leftovers > from previous builds), and make: ... > > ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in ___gmpn_add_nc > from

patch applied (ghc): Turn off split objects on Darwin if XCode < 3.2 (#4013)

2011-02-25 Thread Ian Lynagh
Fri Feb 25 10:43:58 PST 2011 Ian Lynagh * Turn off split objects on Darwin if XCode < 3.2 (#4013) M ./configure.ac +23 M ./mk/config.mk.in +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20110225184358-3fd76-157e45ab5a753551b0eea9518b0444

Re: Do STABLE and HEAD share the same testsuite?

2011-02-25 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Vivian, On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 07:41:14PM +1300, Vivian McPhail wrote: > > Quick question: do STABLE and HEAD share the same testsuite? More-or-less, yes. > i.e. should I not worry if a HEAD nightly build passes a new test but STABLE > fails? It might just mean the testsuite needs to be t

simonmar-win32-stable (x86 Windows STABLE), build 180, Failure

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
simonmar-win32-stable (x86 Windows STABLE), build 180 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/simonmar-win32-stable/180.html darcs checkout | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 2) Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/simonmar-win32-stable/180.ht

simonmar-win32-head (x86 Windows HEAD), build 245, Failure

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
simonmar-win32-head (x86 Windows HEAD), build 245 Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/simonmar-win32-head/245.html darcs checkout | Failure: Just (ExitFailure 2) Build failed Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/simonmar-win32-head/245.html dar

Re: Pattern matching warnings

2011-02-25 Thread Max Bolingbroke
On 25 February 2011 13:08, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > By default we don’t do this, since is a specification change.  Moreover, > it’s very late in the day, since we have a Release Candidate out for 7.0.2. > But he asked, so I’m asking you on his behalf.  I suppose that if you say > “please do” we

Pattern matching warnings

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Dear Haskell Platform gurus Christian Maeder would like GHC's lambda-pattern warning change merged into the 7.0.2 GHC that you are about to release in the Haskell Platform. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4905 By default we don't do this, since is a specification change.

mbolingbroke (x86 OSX HEAD), build 72, Success

2011-02-25 Thread Builder
mbolingbroke (x86 OSX HEAD), build 72 Build succeeded Details: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghcBuilder/builders/mbolingbroke/72.html darcs checkout| Success create mk/build.mk| Success get subrepos | Success repo versions | Success setting version date

RE: miscellaneous Core questions

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| Hi Adam, I am only in a position to speak about the FunTy (EqPred t1 t2) t3 | question. | | As I've written before, unless I am pretty unaware of transformations someone | is performing in the | desugarer or later on, you will never encounter such a type. The type you are | looking for is r

Re: miscellaneous Core questions

2011-02-25 Thread Max Bolingbroke
On 24 February 2011 19:08, Adam Megacz wrote: >  - Can I count on the desugarer and core-to-core passes preserving the >    syntactic order of the branches in a (Let (Rec branches) e)? Absolutely not. They will in general be reordered, eliminated, whatever. >  - It isn't possible for a single Ca