Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux
(cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Mon Jan 4 19:00:01 GMT 2010.
***
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:36 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 03/01/10 23:19, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > At that point I feel like this patch would be worth committing, minus
> > the libffi/ghc.mk hack and possibly name changes, so I'm even more eager
> > to hear about the advice of the GHC community.
Mon Jan 4 07:22:52 PST 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Accept specialised function argument order change
Ignore-this: 8a737ca0a2fc8e3928def8df3516c2db
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.stderr -29 +29
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patc
Thu Dec 24 07:50:17 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Complete test Trac #3772
Ignore-this: bcfc0e627d563a60f89a396209e90135
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/Makefile +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20091224155017-1287e-aa98cb97bb19bec
Thu Dec 24 07:50:01 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add test Trac #3731
Ignore-this: 5ff04c1ea68c646bd79ced99b54d2d4
A ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_run/T3731.hs
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_run/all.T +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/p
Thu Dec 24 07:47:12 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Accept output
Ignore-this: dd7b7f358f827aec71543c74843799f1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/T3234.stderr -4 +4
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/T3717.stderr -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/shou
Thu Dec 24 06:33:49 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add test for Trac #3772
Ignore-this: c294eeba0a6c4c54934d543289ff13c6
A ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/T3772.hs
A ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/T3772.stdout
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_com
I got an odd message from darcs when pushing to
darcs.haskell.org:/home/darcs/haddock2. See below.
darcs: Couldn't find patch matching "hash
20090911081751-1287e-bfa836c636333cb73f10908b5730c32093024767.gz"
But the patch seemed to push successfully; at least if I repeat the command it
On 03/01/10 23:19, Maxime Henrion wrote:
At that point I feel like this patch would be worth committing, minus
the libffi/ghc.mk hack and possibly name changes, so I'm even more eager
to hear about the advice of the GHC community.
I'd prefer to use something like elf_OBJ_FORMAT rather than
elf
Thu Dec 31 11:40:06 PST 2009 Simon Marlow
* T1969: drop lower bound for max_bytes_used on x86/Linux
Ignore-this: 457515ace9e5ece4be2cd46172e390c9
M ./tests/ghc-regress/perf/compiler/all.T -3 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20091231194006-12142-578
Sun Jan 3 14:36:37 PST 2010 Simon Marlow
* locateOneObj: don't look for dynamic libs in static mode
Ignore-this: 47e5d5eb1b27073b9afa1d804c83c7cd
also replace picIsOn with isDynamicGhcLib, as __PIC__ is not the
correct test for whether the GHC library is dynamically linked.
M ./comp
Mon Jan 4 00:21:55 PST 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Substantial improvements to coercion optimisation
Ignore-this: 376f5cc54c399c4910c21ba2be353655
The main purpose of this patch is to add a bunch of new rules
to the coercion optimiser. They are documented in the (revised)
Appendix
Build results:
bitslayer stable:fail (failed configure)
kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable: lost
tnaur PPC OSX stable 2: fail (failed compile)
x86 Windows stable: pass
x86 Windows stable fast: pass pass lost fail (failed boot) pass pass
x86-64 Linux stable: fail (fai
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed darcs)
x86 Windows head: fail (failed darcs)
x86 Windows head fast: pass pass lost fail (failed boot) pass pass
kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: lost
x86-64 Linux head unreg: fail (failed boot)
Old unexpected test passes:
2410
14 matches
Mail list logo