[nightly] 23-Aug-2009 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2009-08-23 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sun Aug 23 18:00:01 BST 2009. checking out

Re: Sparc/Solaris

2009-08-23 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Duncan Coutts: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 13:26 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: It sounds like Ben doesn't have the bandwidth to commit to being an active maintainer just yet, but he might do in the future (6.12.2). So let's hold off making it Tier-1 until then. We don't have a specific policy as re

Re: Build failures in head.

2009-08-23 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Ben Lippmeier: Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Platform-specific breakage is probably going to stay a nuisance - at least, I have no good idea how to avoid it. If we could somehow get an infrastructure where we could at least validate patches easily on a range of platforms, so that the perso

patch applied (testsuite): TFs: T3220

2009-08-23 Thread chak
Sun Aug 23 19:47:55 PDT 2009 Manuel M T Chakravarty * TFs: T3220 Ignore-this: 3032db152dd0668bb1f2f39d8d50b7f A ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/T3220.hs M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/all.T +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite

patch applied (testsuite): TFs: T3423 was missing -XFlexibleInstances

2009-08-23 Thread chak
Sun Aug 23 19:51:00 PDT 2009 Manuel M T Chakravarty * TFs: T3423 was missing -XFlexibleInstances Ignore-this: 748adedd772e71de8ce6ef2923275c7b M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/T3423.hs +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/200908240251

[nightly] 23-Aug-2009 build of HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2009-08-23 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Sun Aug 23 19:00:01 BST 2009. **

patch applied (ghc): Remove bitrotted IA64 code in Linker.c

2009-08-23 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sun Aug 23 08:16:00 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh * Remove bitrotted IA64 code in Linker.c It breaks the unregisterised build on IA64. M ./rts/Linker.c -205 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090823151600-3fd76-2e6d962ed1c0f1307b9c0ce81c43eb8b747f4485.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): Make consIORef atomic.

2009-08-23 Thread Thomas Schilling
Sat Aug 22 16:09:37 PDT 2009 Thomas Schilling * Make consIORef atomic. Ignore-this: c4570e17a21be724b45c574bd25d0330 M ./compiler/utils/Util.lhs -4 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090822230937-7c5c6-d2f0fad973180ed02faade0eef714998ac9fe616.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): Make updates to external package state idempotent.

2009-08-23 Thread Thomas Schilling
Fri Aug 21 16:53:55 PDT 2009 Thomas Schilling * Make updates to external package state idempotent. Without this, concurrent updates to the EPS could introduce overlapping instances (even though they came from the same module). M ./compiler/iface/LoadIface.lhs +1 View patch online:

Re: Haddock-lexing/parsing/renaming out of GHC

2009-08-23 Thread Isaac Dupree
Isaac Dupree wrote: * Patch to GHC * Patch to Haddock * Everything works now I'll send the patches themselves in separate emails (they're 100-200 KB apiece, I want to try and make the mailing-list not swallow them). well, "awaiting moderator approval" swallowed them for now, but at least the

Haddock-lexing/parsing/renaming out of GHC

2009-08-23 Thread Isaac Dupree
* Patch to GHC * Patch to Haddock * Everything works now I'll send the patches themselves in separate emails (they're 100-200 KB apiece, I want to try and make the mailing-list not swallow them). details: * Patch to GHC: ** will need review (it might be okay but you GHC people will know bette