[nightly] 03-Jun-2009 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2009-06-03 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Wed Jun 3 18:00:01 BST 2009. checking out

patch applied (ghc): Merge the TODO lists in ghc.mk

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Lynagh
Wed Jun 3 05:12:09 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh * Merge the TODO lists in ghc.mk M ./ghc.mk -5 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090603121209-3fd76-3710f65f05d5edb67d66bd2a01a759e2c167bf0a.gz ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-

[nightly] 03-Jun-2009 build of HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2009-06-03 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Wed Jun 3 19:00:01 BST 2009. ***

Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:55 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > For a smoother transition away from base 3 (rather than just dropping it > > and breaking packages), we are just about to make hackage require upper > > bounds on the version of base and we're about to release an update to > > cabal-install

Re: Hackage regressions: 6.10.3 vs HEAD

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:49:24PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 03/06/2009 11:55, Duncan Coutts wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: >>> >>> Having just done some build-all-of-hackage runs, I thought it would be >>> worth taking a look at what regressions there are betw

Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:33 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's the hackage regression results of removing base3-compat (and syb) > > from the HEAD. Starting with 1122 packages. > > Having a couple hundred packages b

Re: Hackage regressions: 6.10.3 vs HEAD

2009-06-03 Thread Simon Marlow
On 03/06/2009 11:55, Duncan Coutts wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: Hi all, Having just done some build-all-of-hackage runs, I thought it would be worth taking a look at what regressions there are between 6.10.3 and the HEAD. Great. cmath-0.3

patch applied (testsuite): bump the threshold for T1969 on x86_64 again

2009-06-03 Thread Simon Marlow
Wed Jun 3 04:04:58 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow * bump the threshold for T1969 on x86_64 again Ignore-this: 68a111d110396ae08f7d6f4a05bc2827 M ./tests/ghc-regress/space_leaks/all.T -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20090603110458-12142-033dc416a0256bdf

patch applied (ghc): Tighten up the DocBook XSL stylesheet test

2009-06-03 Thread Simon Marlow
Wed Jun 3 03:12:44 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow * Tighten up the DocBook XSL stylesheet test Ignore-this: e68f96360250831634c77914afe11566 It wasn't failing even when the DTD was not found. M ./aclocal.m4 -9 +20 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090603101244-1

patch applied (ghc): fix logic for BUID_DOCBOOK_HTML

2009-06-03 Thread Simon Marlow
Wed Jun 3 02:23:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow * fix logic for BUID_DOCBOOK_HTML Ignore-this: f255bbaf00713b998370c810e7ab75d3 M ./configure.ac -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090603092313-12142-d6a1eaa4690cd5d7871195ef92e9e6a56368d6b4.gz _

Re: Hackage regressions: 6.10.3 vs HEAD

2009-06-03 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Hi all, > > Having just done some build-all-of-hackage runs, I thought it would be > worth taking a look at what regressions there are between 6.10.3 and the > HEAD. Great. > cmath-0.3 InstallOk BuildFailed > Variou

Re: Regressions when removing base3-compat

2009-06-03 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 16:33 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the hackage regression results of removing base3-compat (and syb) > from the HEAD. Starting with 1122 packages. Having a couple hundred packages break is significantly more than we had at the 6.8 -> 6.10 transition. If it'

patch applied (ghc): Allow RULES for seq, and exploit them

2009-06-03 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Wed Jun 3 02:29:56 PDT 2009 simo...@microsoft.com * Allow RULES for seq, and exploit them Ignore-this: 7d72898475a3a76fea48c9a85ea2dfd Roman found situations where he had case (f n) of _ -> e where he knew that f (which was strict in n) would terminate if n did. Notice that t

Daily report for head

2009-06-03 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: x86-64 Linux head: pass x86 Windows head fast: pass pass pass fast486 head: fail (failed compile) kgardas head: pass phil P4 Ubuntu Linux head: fail (failed compile) sparky head: fail (failed compile) tnaur PPC OSX head 2: fai