[nightly] 31-Oct-2008 build of HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux (cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Fri Oct 31 19:00:01 GMT 2008. **

patch applied (ghc-6.10/ghc): Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837

Fri Oct 31 11:17:46 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837 M ./utils/ghc-pkg/Main.hs +5 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.10/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031181746-3fd76-9b9f7cee916a97b260cbebed04cb6e49e8b1

patch applied (ghc): Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837

Fri Oct 31 11:17:46 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837 M ./utils/ghc-pkg/Main.hs +5 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031181746-3fd76-9b9f7cee916a97b260cbebed04cb6e49e8b1673e.gz

patch applied (ghc): We now require GHC 6.6 to build the HEAD (and thus 6.12)

Fri Oct 31 10:15:06 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * We now require GHC 6.6 to build the HEAD (and thus 6.12) M ./configure.ac -2 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031171506-3fd76-de69f40baad826696adae14672856b84725a3610.gz ___

patch applied (ghc-6.10/ghc): Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results.

Tue Oct 28 11:23:10 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results. MERGE TO 6.10. M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.10/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182310-7c5c6-e6b9ac463096dd2cb304a293ea20a2

Re: patch applied (ghc): Quickfix for warning.

2008/10/31 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Max, > > this broke the build due to a unused variable warning (by default we > use -Werror). I couldn't tell whether the complete line should be > removed or whether you actually wanted to use that result somewhere. > Could you please send a prop

patch applied (ghc): :set prompt now understand Haskell String syntax; trace #2652

Fri Oct 31 07:52:27 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * :set prompt now understand Haskell String syntax; trace #2652 M ./compiler/ghci/InteractiveUI.hs -4 +7 M ./docs/users_guide/ghci.xml -1 +3 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031145227-3fd76-4

patch applied (/haskell/ghc): Correct the minimum GHC version needed on the 6.8.3 download page

Fri Oct 31 10:29:25 EDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Correct the minimum GHC version needed on the 6.8.3 download page M ./download_ghc_683.html -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c

patch applied (ghc): Comments only

Fri Oct 31 07:02:36 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Comments only M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -2 +4 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031140236-1287e-5ea1719b876134df7116867979f709326c7e30e7.gz ___ Cvs-ghc mai

Re: Hierarchical Modules for GHC

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:53:18AM +0100, Thomas Schilling wrote: > > After some dependency analysis and a (more or less) careful inspection > of the GHC source code, I put together a proposal for GHC's new > hierarchical layout: Great job, thanks Thomas! I don't really have much to say. On the

Re: Please validate!

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:55:11AM +, Max Bolingbroke wrote: > Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the > reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The > latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source > code, and validate

Re: patch applied (ghc): Quickfix for warning.

Max, this broke the build due to a unused variable warning (by default we use -Werror). I couldn't tell whether the complete line should be removed or whether you actually wanted to use that result somewhere. Could you please send a proper fix? It's line 384, btw. Cheers, Thomas 2008/10/31 T

patch applied (ghc): Quickfix for warning.

Fri Oct 31 04:31:25 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Quickfix for warning. M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031113125-7c5c6-a7179657c6ef36b5f6afb5710224365826c4a09f.gz _

patch applied (ghc): Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results.

Tue Oct 28 11:23:10 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results. MERGE TO 6.10. M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182310-7c5c6-e6b9ac463096dd2cb304a293ea20a223d3eba96

patch applied (ghc): Minor refactoring.

Tue Oct 28 11:22:02 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Minor refactoring. M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs -3 +1 M ./compiler/main/HscTypes.lhs -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182202-7c5c6-07ca58c6bdde5bea672050be19c7090b305b1e4d.gz __

patch applied (ghc): Include record fields in tags.

Tue Oct 28 11:05:38 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Include record fields in tags. M ./utils/ghctags/GhcTags.hs -10 +5 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028180538-7c5c6-6163009315c61d7fb86a4b817f819cbfb13155cf.gz __

patch applied (ghc): Fix imports

Fri Oct 31 02:23:06 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Fix imports M ./compiler/simplCore/CoreMonad.lhs -6 +9 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031092306-1287e-6a294be206af95f49e222f01a7352fee4efa06fc.gz ___ Cvs-ghc m

patch applied (testsuite): Follow improvements in type signatures

Fri Oct 31 02:06:42 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Follow improvements in type signatures M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr -1 +1 M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt13.stderr -1 +1 M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt7.stderr -2 +2 M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/t

RE: Please validate!

sorry I thought I had. Running now. S | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max | Bolingbroke | Sent: 31 October 2008 07:55 | To: Manuel M T Chakravarty | Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Please validate! | | Ah, sorry Manuel! I am in

Re: Please validate!

Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source code, and validate just bombs out when Haddock reports documentation generation failure - do

Daily report for stable

Build results: x86 Linux stable:fail (failed configure) x86-64 Linux stable: lost Old unexpected test failures: 1861 1 kgardas stable 2469 2 malcolm stable T2627 1 x86-64 Linux stable T2700 2 kgardas stable T2701 2 kgardas sta

Daily report for head

Build results: x86-64 Linux head: lost gabor head: pass malcolm head:pass tnaur x86 Linux head:fail (failed stage1) x86-64 Linux head unreg: lost New unexpected test failures: gadt-escape1 1 gabor head gadt131 gabor head gadt7 1 g