Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux
(cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Fri Oct 31 19:00:01 GMT 2008.
**
Fri Oct 31 11:17:46 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837
M ./utils/ghc-pkg/Main.hs +5
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.10/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031181746-3fd76-9b9f7cee916a97b260cbebed04cb6e49e8b1
Fri Oct 31 11:17:46 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Refuse to register packages with unversioned dependencies; trac #1837
M ./utils/ghc-pkg/Main.hs +5
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031181746-3fd76-9b9f7cee916a97b260cbebed04cb6e49e8b1673e.gz
Fri Oct 31 10:15:06 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* We now require GHC 6.6 to build the HEAD (and thus 6.12)
M ./configure.ac -2 +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031171506-3fd76-de69f40baad826696adae14672856b84725a3610.gz
___
Tue Oct 28 11:23:10 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results.
MERGE TO 6.10.
M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.10/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182310-7c5c6-e6b9ac463096dd2cb304a293ea20a2
2008/10/31 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Max,
>
> this broke the build due to a unused variable warning (by default we
> use -Werror). I couldn't tell whether the complete line should be
> removed or whether you actually wanted to use that result somewhere.
> Could you please send a prop
Fri Oct 31 07:52:27 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* :set prompt now understand Haskell String syntax; trace #2652
M ./compiler/ghci/InteractiveUI.hs -4 +7
M ./docs/users_guide/ghci.xml -1 +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031145227-3fd76-4
Fri Oct 31 10:29:25 EDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Correct the minimum GHC version needed on the 6.8.3 download page
M ./download_ghc_683.html -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c
Fri Oct 31 07:02:36 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Comments only
M ./compiler/deSugar/DsBinds.lhs -2 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031140236-1287e-5ea1719b876134df7116867979f709326c7e30e7.gz
___
Cvs-ghc mai
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:53:18AM +0100, Thomas Schilling wrote:
>
> After some dependency analysis and a (more or less) careful inspection
> of the GHC source code, I put together a proposal for GHC's new
> hierarchical layout:
Great job, thanks Thomas!
I don't really have much to say. On the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:55:11AM +, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
> Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the
> reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The
> latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source
> code, and validate
Max,
this broke the build due to a unused variable warning (by default we
use -Werror). I couldn't tell whether the complete line should be
removed or whether you actually wanted to use that result somewhere.
Could you please send a proper fix?
It's line 384, btw.
Cheers,
Thomas
2008/10/31 T
Fri Oct 31 04:31:25 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Quickfix for warning.
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSplice.lhs -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031113125-7c5c6-a7179657c6ef36b5f6afb5710224365826c4a09f.gz
_
Tue Oct 28 11:23:10 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Export typeclasses for accessing compiler results.
MERGE TO 6.10.
M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182310-7c5c6-e6b9ac463096dd2cb304a293ea20a223d3eba96
Tue Oct 28 11:22:02 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Minor refactoring.
M ./compiler/main/GHC.hs -3 +1
M ./compiler/main/HscTypes.lhs -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028182202-7c5c6-07ca58c6bdde5bea672050be19c7090b305b1e4d.gz
__
Tue Oct 28 11:05:38 PDT 2008 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Include record fields in tags.
M ./utils/ghctags/GhcTags.hs -10 +5
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081028180538-7c5c6-6163009315c61d7fb86a4b817f819cbfb13155cf.gz
__
Fri Oct 31 02:23:06 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix imports
M ./compiler/simplCore/CoreMonad.lhs -6 +9
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081031092306-1287e-6a294be206af95f49e222f01a7352fee4efa06fc.gz
___
Cvs-ghc m
Fri Oct 31 02:06:42 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Follow improvements in type signatures
M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt13.stderr -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/gadt/gadt7.stderr -2 +2
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/t
sorry I thought I had. Running now.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
| Bolingbroke
| Sent: 31 October 2008 07:55
| To: Manuel M T Chakravarty
| Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Please validate!
|
| Ah, sorry Manuel! I am in
Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the
reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The
latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source
code, and validate just bombs out when Haddock reports documentation
generation failure - do
Build results:
x86 Linux stable:fail (failed configure)
x86-64 Linux stable: lost
Old unexpected test failures:
1861 1 kgardas stable
2469 2 malcolm stable
T2627 1 x86-64 Linux stable
T2700 2 kgardas stable
T2701 2 kgardas sta
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: lost
gabor head: pass
malcolm head:pass
tnaur x86 Linux head:fail (failed stage1)
x86-64 Linux head unreg: lost
New unexpected test failures:
gadt-escape1 1 gabor head
gadt131 gabor head
gadt7 1 g
22 matches
Mail list logo