Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
(cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx
Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Fri Oct 17 18:02:05 BST 2008.
checking out
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux
(cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Fri Oct 17 19:00:01 BST 2008.
**
Fri Oct 17 12:59:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Clean the bootstrapping extensible-exceptions package
M ./libraries/Makefile -3 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.10/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081017195942-3fd76-d2a4698e0c9a1e3d6b9deb5724e5bf4ade7db497.gz
___
Fri Oct 17 12:59:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Clean the bootstrapping extensible-exceptions package
M ./libraries/Makefile -3 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20081017195942-3fd76-d2a4698e0c9a1e3d6b9deb5724e5bf4ade7db497.gz
Hi Christian,
Yes I am sure the libs are sane. I have been using them with other apps fine
without issues.
But, now I have done the following to get 6.6.1 working for this issue:
I have edited the ghc * ghci wrapper script and added LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/
opt/pkgs/readline/5.0/lib' (and exported
Hi everyone,
I'm happy to announce that dynamic library support is back and shows
promissing results with the testsuite. At the beginning of the year we
had a similar situation but then due to my lack of time, I was not
able to complete the whole thing and it started bitrotting. But in the
last tw
Hi Neil,
On Friday 17 October 2008 17:56, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Thorkil, more information:
>
> => 2228(normal)
> cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2228
> 2228.run.stdout 2>2228.run.stderr
> => 2636(normal)
> cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-
Hi,
Thanks Thorkil, more information:
=> 2228(normal)
cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2228
2228.run.stdout 2>2228.run.stderr
=> 2636(normal)
cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2636
2636.run.stdout 2>2636.run.stderr
Actual stdout output differs fr
Hello,
On Friday 17 October 2008 17:41, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing validation under Windows XP, using HEAD from a few hours ago, I
> get the results:
>
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at The current date is: 17/10/2008
> Enter the new date: (dd-mm-yy)
> 2221 total tests, wh
Hi,
Doing validation under Windows XP, using HEAD from a few hours ago, I
get the results:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at The current date is: 17/10/2008
Enter the new date: (dd-mm-yy)
2221 total tests, which gave rise to
8313 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failur
John Dias and I propose to commit a very large batch of changes to the code
generator and Cmm, to the HEAD, shortly. The baseline setup will be to
continue to use the old codegen path, but the new path will be available too.
In due course we'll flip the bit, so that the default is to use the n
Hi!
Thanks for showing me around! Much Appreciated!
I got 6.6.1 version going for suse linux enterprise server 9 32-bit platform.
When I tried the same version for suse linux enterprise server 9 64-bit, I got
the libreadline.so.5 shared lib not found error. I do have readline ver. 5
installe
Build results:
x86 Linux stable:fail (exception boottestsuite)
x86 Windows stable: fail (failed stage1)
x86 Windows stable fast: pass pass pass pass pass pass
x86-64 Linux stable: lost lost
Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days:
gabor stable
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed bindisttest failed slave lost)
x86 Windows head fast: pass pass pass pass pass pass
gabor head: pass
kgardas head:fail (failed stage1)
malcolm head:pass
tnaur x86 Linux head:pass
x86-64 Linux head unreg:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 23:25 -0600, Toufique, Imam wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Thanks very much for responding to my e-mail.
>
> If it is not too much of trouble, could you please explain the binary
> build process? I am looking at the url you sent and I am not sure
> where to start( to be honest wit
15 matches
Mail list logo