On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:40:54AM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
>
> I've tracked down a bug, involving newline characters that is the
> combination of GHC and Haddock, but involves the C Pre Processor -
> hence sending the bug report for general discussion to everyone
> concerned first. I suspect t
Is there a preferred way to *not* install some of the tools internally
used by GHC and built by Cabal? There's at least utils/pwd/pwd
that really shouldn't be installed anywhere outside the build tree.
Ciao,
Kili
--
rschwebel: ASCII ist genial, man kann so schön diffen :-)
jbe : Gra
Wed Sep 10 08:42:00 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Remove dataConInstOrigDictsAndArgTys
This suspicious function had just one call, in BuildTyCl.mkNewTyConRhs.
I've done it another way now, which is tidier.
M ./compiler/basicTypes/DataCon.lhs -21 +3
M ./compiler/iface/BuildTy
I ran a full testsuite today. Several bytestring tests are seg-faulting
consistently, when -O is on. See below. Does anyone have a clue about why?
Simon
=> bytestring001(normal)
cd ./lib/Data.ByteString &&
'/64playpen/simonpj/builds/HEAD-1/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' -fforce-recomp
-dcore-l
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:06:37PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sat Sep 6 07:02:43 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * Update the users guide to point at the in-tree core.ps.gz
> > It used to point to a file o
Sun Sep 7 09:11:38 PDT 2008
* #2533: Generic functions that take integral arguments should work the same
way as their prelude counterparts
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/Data.List/all.T -1 +1
A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/Data.List/genericNegative001.hs
A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/Data.List
Tue Sep 9 15:16:27 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* We always install stage2, so we need to always put stage2 into bindists
M ./compiler/Makefile -1 +1
M ./ghc/Makefile -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080909221627-3fd76-000f5ea144c224c06
Tue Sep 9 04:39:29 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add a do-nothing install-docs rule in ext-core/ when LATEX_DOCS=NO
M ./docs/ext-core/Makefile +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080909113929-3fd76-3df098469c8b8e0e06c30344405a5ca1448b7c7b.gz
__
Tue Sep 9 04:35:43 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Link to core.pdf, not core.ps.gz
M ./docs/users_guide/using.xml -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080909113543-3fd76-516aac9f03a217d7cbfe5e33ef3eb95c919417fb.gz
_
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a little worried by the success...
The trickier part is the sync-script, but I use a lock for that and it
will fail (and did so before) if it cannot obtain this lock. Due to
Git's SHA-1 checksums, I'm fairly certain that
Simon M is at IFL today, so I suggest we cancel the GHC IRC meeting.
Simon
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Wed Sep 10 07:20:42 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix debug message formatting on Windows
M ./rts/Threads.c -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910142042-1287e-9d86da18bca3ac0fa5e1bb4f166afac86afc3fca.gz
___
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Recent patch to threads.c seems to have broken windows. Pls fix or advise!
urk, I stopped ignoring warnings in that module, and it looks like there
was a warning lurking inside #ifdef mingw32.
I'm not by a Windows machine right now, but you could try replacing %ld
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
I'm not sure. It could be some permission thing as a result of how
the script works that syncs with the Github repo. Github uses ssh key
authentication to identify the user, so we set up a keyfile that
should b
it happened once more today already. but many other pushes did not elicit that
msg
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh
| Sent: 10 September 2008 12:10
| To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Git problem
|
| On Wed, Sep 10, 200
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:09:59PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
> > I'm not sure. It could be some permission thing as a result of how
> > the script works that syncs with the Github repo. Github uses ssh key
> > authentication to id
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:12:43AM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> >I've been largely ignoring messages about perceived deficiencies in the
> >current build system, given the consensus is to replace it anyway, but
> >it seems to me that it has gotten better, not worse, in this respect.
>
> Ignoring m
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
> I'm not sure. It could be some permission thing as a result of how
> the script works that syncs with the Github repo. Github uses ssh key
> authentication to identify the user, so we set up a keyfile that
> should be used by eve
Simon
Recent patch to threads.c seems to have broken windows. Pls fix or advise!
Unpulling: Fix race condition in wakeupThreadOnCapability() (#2574)
did not fix
Thanks
Simon
c:/simonpj/darcs/HEAD/ghc/stage1-inplace/ghc -optc-Werror -optc-Wall -optc-W
-optc-Wstrict-prototypes -optc-Wmissing-p
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Is this a change from 6.8.3? NetBSD currently provides 6.8.3 as an
optional package for NetBSD/i386 4.0, with ghci included and without
any mmap patches as far as I know. It was also working for me on
NetBSD/a
Wed Sep 10 03:18:19 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix typo in T2573
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/T2573.hs -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080910101819-f1c6d-6151535579e0f1909f745d733cb0aefd7819ca6a.gz
__
I've been largely ignoring messages about perceived deficiencies in the
current build system, given the consensus is to replace it anyway, but
it seems to me that it has gotten better, not worse, in this respect.
Ignoring messages, apart from contributing to an unfriendly impression,
loses the o
Wed Sep 10 02:58:16 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Check the *right* set of type variables for escape!
I did the wrong checkSigTyVars, which (happily) triggered an ASSERT
failure. This should fix it.
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs -4 +4
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcType.lhs
Wed Sep 10 02:50:37 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Eyeball test for Trac #2581
A ./tests/ghc-regress/eyeball/record1.hs
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080910095037-1287e-69e7796e5e468d44b92d4c3090e29b357fe1cbe3.gz
_
Hi Chris
| If you can remember a few months ago we discused porting HaRe over to GHC,
| and at the time I had to focus on writing up my PhD thesis. My PhD thesis
| is pretty much ready for submission (within the next couple of days) and I
| was wondering if there was an opportunity to continue the
I'm not sure. It could be some permission thing as a result of how
the script works that syncs with the Github repo. Github uses ssh key
authentication to identify the user, so we set up a keyfile that
should be used by everyone with push access to darcs.h.o. Apparently,
Git creates some files w
Wed Sep 10 01:55:55 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Test Trac #2573
A ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/T2573.hs
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/all.T +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/2008091008-1287e-577be6d7b5e3e0b2dfa
Wed Sep 10 01:55:27 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* T2572 needs RankNTypes
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/T2572.hs -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080910085527-1287e-58f59d71debfa27ba8f811ad291e89ecc37b7198.gz
_
Wed Sep 10 01:54:34 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Follow error message wibbles
M ./tests/ghc-regress/deriving/should_fail/drvfail011.stderr -9 +8
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail065.stderr -10 +10
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail067.stderr -71 +71
Tue Sep 9 03:16:11 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Test Trac 2572
A ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/T2572.hs
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/all.T +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080909101611-1287e-f32e4bd62fce29d60af1
Wed Sep 10 01:51:21 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* More refactoring of instance declarations (fixes Trac #2572)
In refactoring instance declarations I'd taken a short cut over
scoped type variables, but it wasn't right as #2572 shows.
Fixing it required a significant chunk of further r
Wed Sep 10 01:30:14 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix Trac #2581: inlining of record selectors
Bryan discovered that a non-trivial record selector (non-trivial in
the sense that it has to reconstruct the result value because of
UNPACK directives) weren't being inlined. The reason was t
Wed Sep 10 01:23:13 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix Trac #2573; and explanatory comment
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcMType.lhs -1 +6
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910082313-1287e-192f400e7b91938bf6cb0d192d2ca92d87c586b0.gz
___
Wed Sep 10 01:20:03 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix the zonking of HsWrappers
HsWrappers are horribly inconsistent at the moment. I intended that
WpLam, WpApp are for evidence abstraction/application
WpTyLam, WpTyApp are for type abstraction/application
But when we zonk (W
Wed Sep 10 01:19:13 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add newDictOcc, newDictOccs
M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -18 +36
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910081913-1287e-de55ac8d49f287f98b7f2e19367f9720aeaf3a96.gz
Wed Sep 10 01:18:15 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Layout and type synonyms only
M ./compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs -4 +5
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910081815-1287e-be141028a2616ebaa09067e7b58968844fa05204.gz
_
Wed Sep 10 01:15:28 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Robustify the setting of implied flags
When setting implied flags, do so recursively. So if -Xa implies -Xb,
and -Xb implies -Xc, we do the right thing.
I thought we needed this, but we don't. But it seems like a good idea
anyway.
Wed Sep 10 01:15:10 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rename a variable
M ./compiler/rename/RnPat.lhs -3 +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910081510-1287e-9dd45cee0e90531b3f514a72cc35dc72167ec4e0.gz
___
Cvs-ghc ma
Tue Sep 9 23:50:30 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Comments only
M ./compiler/coreSyn/CoreSubst.lhs -1 +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910065030-1287e-3912a60f8b5a15b7c9f5644462b1e3b5b366e7fe.gz
___
Cvs-ghc m
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:15:15PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Claus Reinke wrote:
What is wrong with a proper 'make', cleaning, dependencies,
and all, at least as an aim, if not yet in practice? Of course, you
can move house every time your dirty plates fill your sink, so tha
I got the following message re the Git repo when pushing a darcs patch. I
don't know what it means.
Simon
dpush -av
darcs push -av --no-set-default [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/darcs/ghc
scp: /home/darcs/ghc/_darcs/format: No such file or directory
scp: /home/darcs/ghc/_darcs/prefs/sources: No such
Wed Sep 10 00:35:29 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Simplify the type signature for tcPolyBinds
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcBinds.lhs -23 +30
M ./compiler/typecheck/TcClassDcl.lhs -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080910073529-1287e-eaeaffbe88cdce85b487e8
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed darcs)
x86 Windows head:fail (failed bindist bindisttest nofib.boot.0
nofib.boot.0_2 nofib.boot.0_3 nofib.boot.0_4 nofib.boot.0_5) fail (failed
getsubrepos)
x86 Windows head fast: pass pass lost fail (failed darcs) fail (failed
getsu
Build results:
fast486 stable: fail (failed darcs)
gabor stable: pass
kgardas stable: fail (failed stage1)
malcolm stable: fail (failed darcs)
mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: fail (failed darcs)
x86 Windows stable: fail (
44 matches
Mail list logo