Re: problem building HEAD out of the box.

2008-09-04 Thread Ben Lippmeier
Alright, on further investigation it turns out this problem was due to my /bin/sh being a link to the dash shell instead of bash. The IT people here have recently upgraded our linux distro, and http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh says that from Ubuntu 6.10 they're using /bin/dash instead of

Re: [darcs-users] OpenBSD users here?

2008-09-04 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:36:56PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > Yes, it turned out to be some malfunctioning switch hardware had > messed up the load balancing. Hopefully now we'll see both the new > bandwidth, and reliable access, together. More reliable: yes. Faster: no. I'll have a look at all

patch applied (ghc): Define _BSD_SOURCE in Stg.h

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
Thu Sep 4 11:50:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Define _BSD_SOURCE in Stg.h This means S_ISSOCK gets defined on Linux M ./includes/Stg.h -1 +5 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080904185042-3fd76-c5c978bc127f2b95e134597153da8c2d660cebac.gz __

patch applied (ghc): Add a note explaining a couple of seq's

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
Thu Sep 4 08:49:31 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add a note explaining a couple of seq's M ./compiler/rename/RnBinds.lhs -3 +16 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080904154931-3fd76-e34977a58242e9deb64a909325412cc6a78d90b7.gz

Re: [darcs-users] OpenBSD users here?

2008-09-04 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:33 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Duncan Coutts > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to let you and others know, the problem with the network has now > > been identified and, we think, fixed. > > That's wonderful! Thank you! Just to be clear

Re: [darcs-users] OpenBSD users here?

2008-09-04 Thread Don Stewart
Yes, it turned out to be some malfunctioning switch hardware had messed up the load balancing. Hopefully now we'll see both the new bandwidth, and reliable access, together. -- Don duncan.coutts: > Just to let you and others know, the problem with the network has now > been identified and, we th

Re: [darcs-users] OpenBSD users here?

2008-09-04 Thread Duncan Coutts
Just to let you and others know, the problem with the network has now been identified and, we think, fixed. On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 23:28 +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:22:33PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > > - darcs.haskell.org is very slow, and sometimes not reachable a

[nightly] 04-Sep-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2008-09-04 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Thu Sep 4 18:02:06 BST 2008. checking out

External Core output path

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Chevalier
While I'm trying to integrate some additional tools I wrote into the ext-core library, I thought I might say a word about why getting GHC to read Core back in is hard (and I don't think I've mentioned this before, though I may have forgotten). When optimization is turned on, or even when it's not,

RE: patch applied (ghc): Major change in compilation of instancedeclarations (fix Trac #955, #2328)

2008-09-04 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Good point, Claus. Having thought I was done, I have, sadly, spent the entire day trying to unravel the subtle consequences of the way regex-base (and DoCon in fact) use overlapping instances. I think I've fixed that now, but am chasing a specialiser bug -- I can't think how my last nofib run

patch applied (testsuite): Replace 'pure' by 'arr'

2008-09-04 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Thu Sep 4 08:55:28 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Replace 'pure' by 'arr' M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/tc192.hs -2 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080904155528-f1c6d-2bd20e3ec58a405c25314c89690f6d654e32ebeb.gz

patch applied (testsuite): Comment only

2008-09-04 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Thu Sep 4 08:54:52 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Comment only M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_compile/tc176.hs -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080904155452-f1c6d-294542b3ddc0e4079eb670ca71f102280fd39484.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): fix message for missing packages

2008-09-04 Thread Ross Paterson
Thu Sep 4 09:48:16 PDT 2008 Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fix message for missing packages An incorrect libraries/ prefix was being added. M ./boot -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080904164816-b47d3-f47e253fd95eed9e6980acd1ef7e4673ab97b437

Re: patch applied (ghc): Turn on optimisation for stage2 when validating

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:36:32AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > | Thu Aug 28 05:48:14 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | * Update the build system to handle building and using haddock2 > | One side-effect of this is that we need to build the install-utils with > | stage2 ra

Re: patch applied (packages/base): Add missing files

2008-09-04 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Ian Lynagh: On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:10:41AM -0700, Ian Lynagh wrote: Thu Sep 4 03:09:51 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add missing files Sorry all; I cleared my base repo of cruft so I could just do "darcs rec -l", but I must have forgotten to actually do so! May I suggest t

Re: GHC and extralibs

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:45:24AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > So shall we do that? OK, let's leave extralibs in the nightly builds for now, then. Thanks Ian ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinf

Re: darcs-all

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > The darcs-all script is very useful, but could you pls add some comments at > the start to explain the user interface? Done! Please let me know if you'd like more detail about anything, and of course feel free to reformat/re

patch applied (ghc): Add darcs-all usage info

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
Thu Sep 4 05:54:12 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add darcs-all usage info M ./darcs-all +18 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080904125412-3fd76-2ac84d9a95971889252752a21360d32e60f72e63.gz ___ Cvs-ghc

darcs-all

2008-09-04 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Ian The darcs-all script is very useful, but could you pls add some comments at the start to explain the user interface? I wanted to get extralibs today. Reading the code its seemed that --extra was the thing to say. But darcs-all get --extra didn't work. Turns out that darcs

GHC and extralibs

2008-09-04 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Ian | By the way, did we agree to drop the extralibs now in the #ghc meeting? | I couldn't quite tell if there was a conclusion or not. That should | solve all but the bandwidth/gateway issues. Ah, apologies -- I should have cc'd you on my question to Don and Duncan about the Haskell Platform.

Daily report for head

2008-09-04 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed getsubrepos) x86 Windows head:fail (failed getsubrepos) x86 Windows head fast: fail (failed stage2 boottestsuite runtestsuite) fail (failed stage2 boottestsuite runtestsuite) fail (failed getsubrepos) fail (failed stage2 boottestsuite

Daily report for stable

2008-09-04 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: fast486 stable: fail (failed darcs) gabor stable: pass kgardas stable: fail (failed stage1) mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: fail (failed darcs) tnaur x86 Linux stable: pass x86 Windows stable: fail (failed getsubre