patch applied (testsuite): add test for leakage of Control.Monad.Instances into Haskell 98 modules

2008-08-16 Thread Ross Paterson
Sat Aug 16 18:10:10 PDT 2008 Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * add test for leakage of Control.Monad.Instances into Haskell 98 modules A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/ A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/all.T A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/instance-leaks.hs View patch o

patch applied (testsuite): Skip num009 if fast, as it gives the wrong answer on some platforms

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 12:02:22 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Skip num009 if fast, as it gives the wrong answer on some platforms M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/Numeric/all.T -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816190222-3fd76-a25c55d89235f522306b9bae

patch applied (testsuite): Don't skip readwrite002 on Windows any more

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 11:37:31 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Don't skip readwrite002 on Windows any more We used to skip it because of trac #1198, but that is now fixed M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/all.T -2 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816

patch applied (testsuite): Fix 1288 and 2276 Windows-only tests

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 13:58:17 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Fix 1288 and 2276 Windows-only tests M ./tests/ghc-regress/ffi/should_run/all.T -4 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816205817-3fd76-395f1ffd681328d624251829801ce9a200bcf175.gz ___

patch applied (testsuite): Fix the hReady001 test now that GHC's hReady behaves correctly

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 11:26:38 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Fix the hReady001 test now that GHC's hReady behaves correctly M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/all.T -6 +1 M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/hReady001.hs -3 +3 M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/hReady001.stdout -1 +1 View patch onlin

Re: [darcs-users] darcs and ghc..

2008-08-16 Thread Claus Reinke
|Do you get this using darcs 2? We would appreciate a bug report! Well, okay, I'd like to switch to darcs 2 (forgot that Simon had already convinced me earlier..). But according to darcs.net: - the latest stable release is 2.0.2 - the latest windows binary bundles are 2.0.0 - there i

[nightly] 16-Aug-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2008-08-16 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sat Aug 16 18:02:05 BST 2008. checking out

patch applied (ghc): When doing :l, abandon all breakpoints before we unload everything

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 08:21:35 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * When doing :l, abandon all breakpoints before we unload everything I'm not 100% sure if this is the right fix, but it seems sensible and stops break008 segfaulting for me on amd64/Linux. M ./compiler/ghci/InteractiveUI.hs +1

patch applied (ghc): Comment fixes; trac #2468

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
Sat Aug 16 06:09:10 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Comment fixes; trac #2468 M ./driver/mangler/ghc-asm.lprl -2 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080816130910-3fd76-9198bc64aa693f1e28c07a50c25b70650d92ad5e.gz ___

Re: WARNING: bogus patch pushed

2008-08-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 02:10:14PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > > Nobody answered the question that I (implicitly) raised a few times: > how do you branch ghc with a mixed use of git and darcs? Sorry, I didn't realise you were asking that before. The answer is, the same way that you

Re: WARNING: bogus patch pushed

2008-08-16 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Nobody answered the question that I (implicitly) raised a few times: how do you branch ghc with a mixed use of git and darcs? (I don't know too much of git, but AFAIK, it's notion of branches is pretty different of that of darcs). As far as I can tell, you do it in much the same way as the

Daily report for head

2008-08-16 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: x86-64 Linux head: lost x86 Windows head:fail (failed bindist bindisttest nofib.boot.0 nofib.boot.0_2 nofib.boot.0_3 nofib.boot.0_4 nofib.boot.0_5) x86 Windows head fast: fail (failed boottestsuite runtestsuite) lost lost pass fail (failed stage1) pass x86-64 Linux

Daily report for stable

2008-08-16 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: fast486 stable: fail (failed darcs) kgardas stable: fail (failed darcs) malcolm stable: fail (failed darcs) mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass x86 Windows stable: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows stable fast:pass l