Sat Aug 16 18:10:10 PDT 2008 Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* add test for leakage of Control.Monad.Instances into Haskell 98 modules
A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/
A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/all.T
A ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/haskell98/instance-leaks.hs
View patch o
Sat Aug 16 12:02:22 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Skip num009 if fast, as it gives the wrong answer on some platforms
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/Numeric/all.T -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816190222-3fd76-a25c55d89235f522306b9bae
Sat Aug 16 11:37:31 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Don't skip readwrite002 on Windows any more
We used to skip it because of trac #1198, but that is now fixed
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/all.T -2 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816
Sat Aug 16 13:58:17 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix 1288 and 2276 Windows-only tests
M ./tests/ghc-regress/ffi/should_run/all.T -4 +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/testsuite/_darcs/patches/20080816205817-3fd76-395f1ffd681328d624251829801ce9a200bcf175.gz
___
Sat Aug 16 11:26:38 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix the hReady001 test now that GHC's hReady behaves correctly
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/all.T -6 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/hReady001.hs -3 +3
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/IO/hReady001.stdout -1 +1
View patch onlin
|Do you get this using darcs 2? We would appreciate a bug report!
Well, okay, I'd like to switch to darcs 2 (forgot that Simon had
already convinced me earlier..). But according to darcs.net:
- the latest stable release is 2.0.2
- the latest windows binary bundles are 2.0.0
- there i
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
(cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx
Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sat Aug 16 18:02:05 BST 2008.
checking out
Sat Aug 16 08:21:35 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* When doing :l, abandon all breakpoints before we unload everything
I'm not 100% sure if this is the right fix, but it seems sensible and
stops break008 segfaulting for me on amd64/Linux.
M ./compiler/ghci/InteractiveUI.hs +1
Sat Aug 16 06:09:10 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Comment fixes; trac #2468
M ./driver/mangler/ghc-asm.lprl -2 +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080816130910-3fd76-9198bc64aa693f1e28c07a50c25b70650d92ad5e.gz
___
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 02:10:14PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>
> Nobody answered the question that I (implicitly) raised a few times:
> how do you branch ghc with a mixed use of git and darcs?
Sorry, I didn't realise you were asking that before.
The answer is, the same way that you
Nobody answered the question that I (implicitly) raised a few times:
how do you branch ghc with a mixed use of git and darcs? (I don't
know too much of git, but AFAIK, it's notion of branches is pretty
different of that of darcs).
As far as I can tell, you do it in much the same way as the
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: lost
x86 Windows head:fail (failed bindist bindisttest nofib.boot.0
nofib.boot.0_2 nofib.boot.0_3 nofib.boot.0_4 nofib.boot.0_5)
x86 Windows head fast: fail (failed boottestsuite runtestsuite) lost lost
pass fail (failed stage1) pass
x86-64 Linux
Build results:
fast486 stable: fail (failed darcs)
kgardas stable: fail (failed darcs)
malcolm stable: fail (failed darcs)
mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass
x86 Windows stable: fail (failed stage1)
x86 Windows stable fast:pass l
13 matches
Mail list logo