RE: Priorities for 6.10

| By the way, is everyone OK with increasing the minimum GHC required to | 6.4.2? Apart from allowing some more of the cruft to be removed, Cabal | supports building with GHC >= 6.4.2, so this would allow us to use Cabal | to do more of the building work. What specifically does 6.4.2 provide that

[nightly] 19-Jun-2008 build of STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Thu Jun 19 18:10:01 BST 2008. checki

Re: Priorities for 6.10

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:38:06AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > Neil Mitchell wrote: > > >> While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. > >> Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd > >> be a good idea for us to first discuss what we rea

Re: Priorities for 6.10

isaacdupree: > Neil Mitchell wrote: > >Hi > > > >> While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. > >> Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd > >> be a good idea for us to first discuss what we really want to see > >> happen in the 6.10 ti

Re: Priorities for 6.10

marlowsd: > Neil Mitchell wrote: > > >> While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. > >> Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd > >> be a good idea for us to first discuss what we really want to see > >> happen in the 6.10 time frame a

[nightly] 19-Jun-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Thu Jun 19 18:00:01 BST 2008. checking out

Re: Priorities for 6.10

Neil Mitchell wrote: Hi While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd be a good idea for us to first discuss what we really want to see happen in the 6.10 time frame and then update the ticket

patch applied (testsuite): add test from #2185

Thu Jun 19 04:03:34 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * add test from #2185 A ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/2185/ A ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/2185/2185.hs A ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/2185/Makefile A ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/2185/all.T View patch online:

patch applied (ghc): document some RTS options I added a while ago: -qm, -qw

Thu Jun 19 05:12:27 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * document some RTS options I added a while ago: -qm, -qw M ./docs/users_guide/using.xml -9 +50 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619121227-12142-7d32b7f09bad9583e8707bfe54f1a47cf65ea745.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): Document the change to +RTS -S/-s/-t

Thu Jun 19 05:12:01 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Document the change to +RTS -S/-s/-t M ./docs/users_guide/runtime_control.xml -32 +21 M ./docs/users_guide/sooner.xml -4 +4 M ./docs/users_guide/using.xml -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/pa

patch applied (ghc): +RTS -S -RTS now sends output to stderr (also -s)

Thu Jun 19 04:33:29 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * +RTS -S -RTS now sends output to stderr (also -s) Previously +RTS -Sstderr -RTS was required to send output to stderr, but this is the most common usage and I got tired of typing "stderr". The old default behaviour of sending

patch applied (ghc): document paralel GC option: +RTS -g

Thu Jun 19 05:11:11 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * document paralel GC option: +RTS -g M ./docs/users_guide/runtime_control.xml +37 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/2008061912-12142-c8c52dd339d13e41f7cd8faf78fdfb7bf2d88af3.gz

patch applied (ghc): bytestring is -Wall clean

Wed Jun 18 18:07:02 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * bytestring is -Wall clean M ./libraries/Makefile.local -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619010702-3fd76-a9ac3e5c842c9c6ebbd02b2992fa2891e7ab18c2.gz __

patch applied (ghc): Cabal is -Wall clean

Wed Jun 18 18:04:36 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Cabal is -Wall clean M ./libraries/Makefile.local -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619010436-3fd76-f6a81e8e52ffdf3c5471f985fae4c3e833e432b5.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): The haskell98 library is -Wall clean

Wed Jun 18 18:01:24 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * The haskell98 library is -Wall clean M ./libraries/Makefile.local -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619010124-3fd76-33ab209dbd352e00ad13299c550805d417c706d8.gz ___

patch applied (ghc): template-haskell is now -Wall clean

Wed Jun 18 17:58:11 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * template-haskell is now -Wall clean M ./libraries/Makefile.local -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619005811-3fd76-665600208730428c9239d09c4c801e9d9df8f6c0.gz

patch applied (ghc): containers is now -Wall clean

Wed Jun 18 16:36:51 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * containers is now -Wall clean M ./libraries/Makefile.local -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080618233651-3fd76-fcd2de58cae40bcec5bce6327023469f0d27590f.gz __

Re: Priorities for 6.10

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 12:12 +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote: > Hi > > > > Does anyone have any objections to us doing this? I agree it would be a > > > substantial win. We should consider cabal-install to be a part of Cabal > > - > > > indeed the 'cabal' command is the preferred UI for Cabal now

Re: Priorities for 6.10

Hi > > Does anyone have any objections to us doing this? I agree it would be a > > substantial win. We should consider cabal-install to be a part of Cabal - > > indeed the 'cabal' command is the preferred UI for Cabal now, so to ship > > one without the other seems wrong. > > We'll also have

Re: Priorities for 6.10

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 11:38 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > Neil Mitchell wrote: > > >> While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. > >> Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd be > >> a good idea for us to first discuss what we really w

Re: Priorities for 6.10

Neil Mitchell wrote: While I was away last week I jotted down a list of priorities for 6.10. Some of these are in the bug tracker and some aren't, but I think it'd be a good idea for us to first discuss what we really want to see happen in the 6.10 time frame and then update the ticket data

patch applied (ghc): fix a tiny bug spotted by gcc 4.3

Thu Jun 19 03:09:04 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fix a tiny bug spotted by gcc 4.3 M ./rts/sm/BlockAlloc.c -1 +1 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080619100904-12142-e99187e2001e48fa9a1adea7d27b17fb61a3cc97.gz _

patch applied (ghc): Fix up inlines for gcc 4.3

Thu Jun 19 03:08:49 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Fix up inlines for gcc 4.3 gcc 4.3 emits warnings for static inline functions that its heuristics decided not to inline. The workaround is to either mark appropriate functions as "hot" (a new attribute in gcc 4.3), or sometim

patch applied (ghc): fix warnings with gcc 4.3

Wed Jun 18 07:43:07 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fix warnings with gcc 4.3 M ./rts/STM.c -2 +2 View patch online: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080618144307-12142-61a6c29f95f1d5b36769c0f92195d4212738b782.gz ___ Cvs

patch applied (ghc): it's time to retire ghcprof & friends

Wed Jun 18 07:02:28 PDT 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * it's time to retire ghcprof & friends M ./utils/Makefile -2 +2 R ./utils/prof/ R ./utils/prof/Makefile R ./utils/prof/cgprof/ R ./utils/prof/cgprof/Makefile R ./utils/prof/cgprof/README R ./utils/prof/cg

Daily report for head

Build results: x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows head: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows head fast: fail (failed stage1) pass pass pass pass kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: pass kgardas head: pass tnaur x86 Linux head: fail (failed stage1) x86-64 L

Daily report for stable

Build results: kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable: fail (failed darcs) x86 Windows stable: pass x86 Windows stable fast: pass pass pass pass pass pass x86-64 Linux stable: lost Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days: gabor stable kahl G5 Gen