[nightly] 14-Feb-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Thu Feb 14 18:00:02 GMT 2008. checking out

GHC.Conc - epoll event loop and circular dependencies

Hi all, I was thinking of implementing an epoll based event loop for GHC's threaded RTS, but I've been having some problems with circular dependencies in GHC.Conc, and before I do too much major surgery (this is my first time touching GHC's internals after all...) I'd like to get some advice on th

[nightly] 14-Feb-2008 build of STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Thu Feb 14 18:10:01 GMT 2008. checki

Re: License in the Mac installer

Roman Leshchinskiy: Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Roman Leshchinskiy: It would be possible to distribute GHC itself under BSD3 and readline under the GPL if they were really distributed as two independent thing (and, e.g., optionally linked together during installation). But by prelinkin

Re: License in the Mac installer

to be very precise, I think that the entire distribution is licensed under the intersection of BSD3-for-GHC and GPL-for-everything. Now, this only affects what copyright notices need to stay included (any further restriction would obviously violate the GPL). Also, as far as I can tell, as lo

Re: License in the Mac installer

Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Roman Leshchinskiy: It would be possible to distribute GHC itself under BSD3 and readline under the GPL if they were really distributed as two independent thing (and, e.g., optionally linked together during installation). But by prelinking them, you have created

patch applied (testsuite): Give 6.8-branch output for TH_fail

Sat Jan 19 12:09:49 PST 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Give 6.8-branch output for TH_fail A ./tests/ghc-regress/th/TH_fail-6.8.stderr M ./tests/ghc-regress/th/all.T -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.

patch applied (ghc-6.8/ghc): Allow skipping "make clean" or only re-running the testsuite in validate

Sun Feb 10 08:28:42 PST 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Allow skipping "make clean" or only re-running the testsuite in validate M ./validate -22 +57 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-g

patch applied (ghc-6.8/ghc): MERGED: Refactor Haddock options

Wed Feb 13 09:53:37 PST 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * MERGED: Refactor Haddock options Thu Nov 1 13:17:57 GMT 2007 David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Refactor Haddock options This patch renames the DOC_OPTIONS pragma to OPTIONS_HADDOCK. It also adds "-- # ..."-style H

patch applied (ghc-6.8/ghc): FIX #1821 (Parser or lexer mess-up)

Mon Dec 10 15:06:49 PST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * FIX #1821 (Parser or lexer mess-up) M ./compiler/parser/Lexer.x -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Re: interoperability/portabilizing for GHC.. Summer of Code?

Simon Marlow wrote: Do you think it's plausible to apply for this as haskell.org Summer of Code project (I'm a U.S. college student now, which explains why I've been too busy to work on GHC stuff, and in the fall) ; I don't know much about the process, and of course there's lots of competition,

Re: License in the Mac installer

Bryan O'Sullivan: Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: By all means get legal advice. However, I am curious, what exactly is it in my reasoning that you do not agree with? Essentially, that it is possible to combine GPL and BSD works and distribute the combined result under the BSD license. Surely

Re: License in the Mac installer

Roman Leshchinskiy: Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: * You can link a BSD3 program with a GPL'ed library and distribute the result. (This opinion is supported by the FSF listing BSD3 as a GPL-compatible license on their web pages and this item in their licensing FAQ:

Re: License in the Mac installer

R Hayes: On Feb 12, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: * Whether you link statically or dynamically against a GPL'ed library does not make any difference as far as your legal obligations are concerned. (This opinion is supported, eg, by the following item in the FSF's licensin

Re: interoperability/portabilizing for GHC.. Summer of Code?

Isaac Dupree wrote: here are some of the things that might need or want to be done, extending from my task of making GHC code more portable (which thankfully other people are helping with too, e.g. by cleaning up warnings!) - not just ghc/compiler Haskell code; at least the makefile system ne

Re: A couple patches

Neil Mitchell wrote: Hi The unsafePerformIO patch is something Neil asked me to send in. It's a cleaned up, slightly renamed and documented version of inlinePerformIO that we use in ByteString, but exported from System.IO.Unsafe. Similarly, the unsafeDupablePerformIO are also exported (separate

Daily report for stable

Build results: mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass tnaur PPC OSX stable 2: fail (failed stage2) tnaur x86 Linux stable: pass x86 Windows stable fast:pass Fixed unexpected test failures: concprog001 Old unexpected test failures: 16791 kahl G5 Gen

Daily report for head

Build results: x86 Windows head fast: pass Old unexpected test failures: 16791 kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head barton-mangler-bug 1 tnaur x86 Linux head conc040 1 kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head conc064 2 gabor head concio001.thr 1 kahl