Re: License in the Mac installer

Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > By all means get legal advice. > > However, I am curious, what exactly is it in my reasoning that you do > not agree with? Essentially, that it is possible to combine GPL and BSD works and distribute the combined result under the BSD license. > PS: Once the new e

Re: License in the Mac installer

FWIW, here are my two kopeks. Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: * You can link a BSD3 program with a GPL'ed library and distribute the result. (This opinion is supported by the FSF listing BSD3 as a GPL-compatible license on their web pages and this item in their licensing FAQ:

Re: License in the Mac installer

Bryan O'Sullivan: Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: By offering GHC under BSD3, we do allow people to distribute it under the GPL and hence fullfil our obligations under the GPL (which we incurred by linking - in whatever way - against readline). Does that clarify the point? I believe that

[nightly] 12-Feb-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Tue Feb 12 18:00:02 GMT 2008. checking out

[nightly] 12-Feb-2008 build of STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Tue Feb 12 18:10:02 GMT 2008. checki

Re: License in the Mac installer

Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > By offering GHC under BSD3, we do allow people to distribute > it under the GPL and hence fullfil our obligations under the GPL (which > we incurred by linking - in whatever way - against readline). Does that > clarify the point? I believe that this claim is not a

Re: License in the Mac installer

Thorkil Naur: On Tuesday 12 February 2008 06:56, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Mac installer packages usually present a license to the user to accept during the installation process. Consequently, I added what I think is a correct licensing document to the tree at http://darcs.haskell.org/

Re: License in the Mac installer

Hello, On Tuesday 12 February 2008 06:56, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > Mac installer packages usually present a license to the user to accept > during the installation process. Consequently, I added what I think > is a correct licensing document to the tree at > >http://darcs.haskell.

Daily report for stable

Build results: kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable: pass x86 Windows stable fast: pass pass Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days: tnaur PPC OSX stable x86-64 Linux stable Dropping unexpected test failures reports from builders not seen in 7 days: tnau

Daily report for head

Build results: x86 Windows head fast: pass pass kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: pass Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days: x86-64 Linux head x86-64 Linux head unreg Fixed unexpected test passes: conc052 Dropping unexpected test failures reports fr