[nightly] 08-Feb-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Fri Feb 8 18:00:01 GMT 2008. checking out

[nightly] 08-Feb-2008 build of STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

Build description = STABLE on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Fri Feb 8 18:10:01 GMT 2008. checkin

Re: Simplifier tests (was Re: patch applied (testsuite): Add a new category of "eyeball" tests)

simonmarhaskell: > Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > >I'm all for this, if Roman and/or Don care to help -- thank you! A > >little readme to explain how to add a new test would be good. > > The testsuite is well documented on the wiki: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/RunningTest

RE: Implementing extensible records

Cale It's always nice to hear the sound of someone rolling up their sleeves. | What hints might you have for me in making my way around GHC's source | code? I'm not really very familiar with details of any part of the | compiler at this point, but I have some basic idea of how it's laid | out ove

RE: Simplifier tests (was Re: patch applied (testsuite): Add a new category of "eyeball" tests)

| Right, if we used pcre-light then it wouldn't be tested when validating, | as pcre-light isn't a bootlib. Also, if that's a C wrapper then it's | probably more hassle for people on Windows than a Haskell regex library | would be. | | For the examples you listed, it looks to me like isInfixOf, fi

patch applied (testsuite): Follow change in error message wording

Fri Feb 8 06:25:05 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Follow change in error message wording M ./tests/ghc-regress/module/mod41.stderr -3 +4 M ./tests/ghc-regress/module/mod42.stderr -3 +4 M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail044.stderr -6 +8 M ./tests/ghc-regress/typech

patch applied (testsuite): DoParamM depends on mtl

Fri Feb 8 04:51:26 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DoParamM depends on mtl M ./tests/ghc-regress/rebindable/all.T -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

patch applied (ghc): Adjust error message (Trac #2079)

Thu Feb 7 09:16:22 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Adjust error message (Trac #2079) M ./compiler/typecheck/TcMType.lhs -4 +5 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

patch applied (ghc): Redo inlining patch, plus some tidying up

Thu Feb 7 07:51:02 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Redo inlining patch, plus some tidying up This adds back in the patch * UNDO: Be a little keener to inline It originally broke the compiler because it tickled a Cmm optimisation bug, now fixed. In revisiting this I have als

patch applied (ghc): Comments, and a type signature

Fri Jan 25 09:42:03 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Comments, and a type signature M ./compiler/stranal/DmdAnal.lhs +43 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Re: Simplifier tests (was Re: patch applied (testsuite): Add a new category of "eyeball" tests)

On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 01:19:51PM +1100, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: > Don Stewart wrote: > >rl: > >> > >>And so on. I'll try to implement a simple framework. I'm just not sure > >>if it should be in Haskell, Python or shell? > >> > > > >Grab the pcre-light regex package? > > Yeah, I'd do it like

Re: Simplifier tests (was Re: patch applied (testsuite): Add a new category of "eyeball" tests)

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: I'm all for this, if Roman and/or Don care to help -- thank you! A little readme to explain how to add a new test would be good. The testsuite is well documented on the wiki: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/RunningTests Ian and/or Simon may want

Re: Booting from HC files

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:30:39AM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > If using the generated Makefiles is too hard for bootstrapping, then by > all means build an alternative solution using hand-written Makefiles or > whatever. Ok, sounds like a plan. > >- I need a simple way to get transitive inter-

patch applied (testsuite): add test for #2080

Fri Feb 8 04:42:44 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * add test for #2080 A ./tests/ghc-regress/codeGen/should_run/2080.hs A ./tests/ghc-regress/codeGen/should_run/2080.stdout M ./tests/ghc-regress/codeGen/should_run/all.T +1 ___

patch applied (ghc): FIX #2080: an optimisation to remove a widening was wrong

Fri Feb 8 04:42:19 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * FIX #2080: an optimisation to remove a widening was wrong M ./compiler/cmm/CmmOpt.hs -21 +37 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-

patch applied (ghc): Remove some of the old compat stuff now that we assume GHC 6.4

Fri Feb 8 04:41:32 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Remove some of the old compat stuff now that we assume GHC 6.4 R ./compat/Compat/Directory.hs R ./compat/Compat/RawSystem.hs M ./compat/compat.mk -3 M ./compiler/deSugar/Coverage.lhs -4 M ./compiler/main/Package

patch applied (ghc): Allow runghc to take input from stdin, just like Ruby & Python

Thu Feb 7 06:58:30 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Allow runghc to take input from stdin, just like Ruby & Python M ./utils/runghc/runghc.hs -5 +16 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/

patch applied (ghc): remove a bogus assertion

Thu Feb 7 06:38:05 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * remove a bogus assertion M ./compiler/nativeGen/MachCodeGen.hs -2 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

RE: Shared Libraries in ghci

| > Any chance of documenting your experience on the GHC user documentation page? | > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC (under "collaborative documentation") | > A kind of how-to that worked for you, with pointers to relevant manual parts etc. | | Yes, after all the help I got, a little

RE: Simplifier tests (was Re: patch applied (testsuite): Add a new category of "eyeball" tests)

I'm all for this, if Roman and/or Don care to help -- thank you! A little readme to explain how to add a new test would be good. Ian and/or Simon may want to comment on dependencies, or technology (eg Haskell vs Python). Simon | -Original Message- | From: Roman Leshchinskiy [mailto:[E

Daily report for stable

Build results: gabor stable: pass kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable:pass mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass tnaur PPC OSX stable 2: fail (failed stage2) tnaur x86 Linux stable: pass x86 Windows stable: pass x86 Windows stable fast:pass pass pass

Daily report for head

Build results: x86-64 Linux head: lost x86 Windows head fast: pass pass lost pass pass pass kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: pass x86-64 Linux head unreg: fail (failed stage2 failed slave lost) Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days: x86-64 Linux head