Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
I some cases Applicative is a huge win. Simon's argument is that it is not
possible to use consistently everywhere. I agree that we should strive
to have a
single style for different cases in a single function. However, there
are a lot
of functions that become signific
Claus,
Thanks so much for helping us continue to track this down. The binaries I was
referring are the shiny, new (unofficial) darcs-2 binaries for Windows,
available here:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgm/darcs/
(Linked to from a "DarcsTwo" page on the wiki).
The code base is rather different th
[isn't that address list a bit long?]
Hi Mark
does darcs still descend into it, or are such directories ignored completely?
They are ignored completely. I checked this by using "strace darcs..." and
grepping for a system call to a boring directory. By doing this test with and
without an ent
Claus --
> does darcs still descend into it, or are such directories ignored completely?
They are ignored completely. I checked this by using "strace darcs..." and
grepping for a system call to a boring directory. By doing this test with and
without an entry for a particular directory, I was
Sat Jan 26 13:06:07 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix #2062: foldr1 problem in hpc tool
M ./utils/hpc/HpcMarkup.hs -13 +16
M ./utils/hpc/HpcOverlay.hs -3 +4
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c
Hello,
While fixing 'unused binding' warnings in compiler/types/Unify.lhs I came across
the following in the function match (line 163):
-> do { subst1 <- match_kind menv subst tv1 ty2
; return (extendVarEnv subst tv1' ty2) }
Since the new substitution is not used
On Jan 26, 2008 8:27 AM, Twan van Laarhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having trouble mailing patches to this list.
>
> > Your mail to 'Cvs-ghc' with the subject
> >
> > Re: darcs patch: Use do notation
> >
> > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
Hello,
In some cases where I have experienced this, the problem turned out to be one
of size: I had attached a file and there is a fairly low limit (something like
32K or 64K, as far as I know) on the size of accepted messages.
Best regards
Thorkil
Twan van Laarhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble mailing patches to this list.
Your mail to 'Cvs-ghc' with the subject
Re: darcs patch: Use do notation
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
The message headers matched a filter rule
I have no id
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: lost
x86 Windows head fast: pass lost pass pass pass
kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: pass
tnaur PPC OSX head:pass
x86-64 Linux head unreg: fail (exception stage1)
Dropping unexpected test passes reports from builders not seen in 7 days:
x86-6
Build results:
gabor stable: pass
kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable:pass
mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass
x86 Windows stable fast:pass pass pass pass pass
x86-64 Linux stable:lost
Old unexpected test failures:
16791 kahl G5 Gentoo Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo