Re: unboxed types

Neil Mitchell wrote: Hi Isaac, Or will I have to #define UTopen (# #defined UTclose #) and (UTopen x, y UTclose) Yuk! There is a ticket on adding a prefix form of (#,#), which is currently lacking. Perhaps adding that first, then moving to the unboxed thingy would be best. Also your use of #

patch applied (ghc): fix validation failure on non-i386

Wed Jan 2 07:17:40 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fix validation failure on non-i386 M ./compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs -3 +3 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

patch applied (ghc): expand "out of stack slots" panic to suggest using -fregs-graph, see #1993

Wed Jan 2 07:07:37 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * expand "out of stack slots" panic to suggest using -fregs-graph, see #1993 M ./compiler/nativeGen/RegAllocLinear.hs -1 +2 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.hask

patch applied (ghc): Warning clean, and fix compilation with GHC 6.2.x

Wed Jan 2 03:45:29 PST 2008 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Warning clean, and fix compilation with GHC 6.2.x M ./compiler/deSugar/Coverage.lhs -36 +28 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-g

patch applied (ghc): Add dead code elimination in cmmMiniInline

Thu Dec 20 07:17:34 PST 2007 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add dead code elimination in cmmMiniInline cmmMiniInline counts the uses of local variables, so it can easily eliminate assigments to unused locals. This almost never gets triggered, as we don't generate any dead assignments,

patch applied (testsuite): add test for prefix unboxed tuples

Wed Jan 2 05:28:24 PST 2008 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * add test for prefix unboxed tuples M ./tests/ghc-regress/parser/should_compile/all.T +1 A ./tests/ghc-regress/parser/should_compile/read063.hs ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@ha

patch applied (ghc): implement prefix unboxed tuples (part of #1509)

Wed Jan 2 04:40:01 PST 2008 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * implement prefix unboxed tuples (part of #1509) M ./compiler/parser/Parser.y.pp +5 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Re: darcs patch: implement prefix unboxed tuples syntax (#1509)

Isaac Dupree wrote: attached are patches for ghc and for testsuite. They seem pretty straightforward. Adding prefix-unboxed-tuples turned out to just require a parser modification -- ( contrary to a comment in http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1509 ) for GHC at least, Data.Tuple onl

Re: Remove GHC.Err import from Data.Maybe

Judah Jacobson wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 11:57 AM, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These imports of Err all include {-# SOURCE #-} pragmas, which GHC warns me are unnecessary, but clear change the output. What do the SOURCE pragma's do? I couldn't find them in the manual. They break the

darcs patch: implement prefix unboxed tuples syntax (#1509)

attached are patches for ghc and for testsuite. They seem pretty straightforward. Adding prefix-unboxed-tuples turned out to just require a parser modification -- ( contrary to a comment in http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1509 ) for GHC at least, Data.Tuple only defines data types

Daily report for head

Build results: x86-64 Linux head: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows head: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows head fast: fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) kahl G5 Gentoo Linux head: pass ma

Daily report for stable

Build results: gabor stable: pass kahl G5 Gentoo Linux stable:pass mnemosyne x86-64 Gentoo stable: pass tnaur x86 Linux stable: fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows stable: fail (failed darcs) x86 Windows stable fast:fail (failed darcs) fail (failed dar