patch applied (testsuite): And another failing tyfam test

2007-09-09 Thread Roman Leshchinskiy
Sun Sep 9 23:49:51 PDT 2007 Roman Leshchinskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * And another failing tyfam test A ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.hs M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/all.T +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailin

patch applied (testsuite): Yet another failing type families test

2007-09-09 Thread Roman Leshchinskiy
Sun Sep 9 22:42:49 PDT 2007 Roman Leshchinskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Yet another failing type families test Can't let Tom and Manuel catch up! A ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/Class3.hs M ./tests/ghc-regress/indexed-types/should_compile/all.T +1

full :browse! (#1617, draft patch, and a question)

2007-09-09 Thread Claus Reinke
hi again, i'm currently trying to address issue 2 in ticket #1617, that :browse lists names either qualified or unqualified, not both. given that import statements need not list imported names explicitly, that means ghci users cannot see where unqualified names come from. since every unqualified

[nightly] 09-Sep-2007 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2007-09-09 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/ghc/nightly/HEAD-cam-02-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sun Sep 9 19:30:01 BST 2007. checkin

patch applied (ghc): Include package documentation, n-th attempt...

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 08:40:53 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Include package documentation, n-th attempt... MERGE TO STABLE M ./ghc.spec.in -3 +13 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

patch applied (ghc): Yet another attempt to get the paths for the installed documentation correct

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 05:49:22 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Yet another attempt to get the paths for the installed documentation correct MERGE TO STABLE M ./docs/index.html -1 +1 M ./libraries/Makefile -12 +8 M ./libraries/installPackage.hs -5 +6

patch applied (ghc): Add a "show" target here, too, quite useful for debugging the build process

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 05:38:13 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add a "show" target here, too, quite useful for debugging the build process MERGE TO STABLE M ./libraries/Makefile -1 +4 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailma

patch applied (ghc): Never try to build Haddock docs in ghc/compiler, even with HADDOCK_DOCS=YES

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 05:34:01 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Never try to build Haddock docs in ghc/compiler, even with HADDOCK_DOCS=YES MERGE TO STABLE M ./compiler/Makefile -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman

patch applied (ghc): Removed install-dirs target, it is unnecessary and leads to stray empty directories

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 05:11:57 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Removed install-dirs target, it is unnecessary and leads to stray empty directories MERGE TO STABLE M ./mk/install.mk -14 +1 M ./utils/ghc-pkg/Makefile +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@ha

patch applied (ghc): Removed install-dirs from phony targets, it is unused

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
Sun Sep 9 03:28:15 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Removed install-dirs from phony targets, it is unused MERGE TO STABLE M ./distrib/Makefile -1 +1 ___ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Small Cabal bug

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
The current Cabal used for building GHC has a small bug, it *always* creates the data directory, even if there are no data files in the package. Simple fix: *** /tmp/Install.hs 2007-09-09 14:56:50.0 +0200 --- Distribution/Simple/Install.hs 2007-09-09 12:57:21.0 +0200 ***

Re: Parallel builds

2007-09-09 Thread Sven Panne
On Saturday 08 September 2007 19:33, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > [...] > $(MAKE) always includes the flags (at least with gnumake), cf "info make > MAKE\ Variable". Nope... Don't stop reading manuals prematurely: ;-) http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Options_002fRecursion.html Easy

Daily report for stable

2007-09-09 Thread BuildBot Collator
Build results: x86 Windows stable: fail (failed stage3 failed slave lost) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed darcs) fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage1) x86 Windows stable fast: fail (failed stage1) fail (failed stage2 failed slave lost) fail (failed stage2) fail (failed stage2) Droppin