On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:36:00AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Esa Ilari Vuokko wrote:
> >On 8/3/07, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Fri Aug 3 00:52:31 PDT 2007 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> * cabal01: we need --with-ld=$(LD) for Windows
> >>
> >>M ./tests/ghc-regress/ca
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
(cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /playpen/ghc/nightly/HEAD-cam-02-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx
Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sun Aug 26 19:30:00 BST 2007.
checki
Sun Aug 26 07:45:40 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix retainer profiling
M ./rts/RetainerProfile.c -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Sun Aug 26 06:39:00 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Revert a hack now that the buildds will make a gcc-lib directory on Windows
M ./tests/ghc-regress/cabal/cabal01/Makefile -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.h
Sun Aug 26 05:58:05 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tcrun021 needs -package containers
M ./tests/ghc-regress/typecheck/should_run/all.T -1 +2
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Sun Aug 26 05:49:18 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* dynamic002 needs -package packedstring now
M ./tests/ghc-regress/lib/should_run/all.T -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Sun Aug 26 05:30:41 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* conc068 needs parallel
M ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/should_run/all.T -1 +3
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Sun Aug 26 05:21:17 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* conc057 needs the parallel library
M ./tests/ghc-regress/concurrent/should_run/all.T -1 +3
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Sun Aug 26 05:06:44 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Update array test output
Unfortunately safeIndex is too polymorphic to be able to show the index
or the bounds when we have a bad index.
M ./tests/ghc-regress/array/should_run/arr003.stderr -1 +1
M ./tests/ghc-regress/arr
Sun Aug 26 06:38:30 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* On Windows, stage1 also deps on stamp.inplace-gcc-lib
M ./Makefile -1 +7
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
On Sunday 26 August 2007 14:38, I wrote:
> [...]
>c) "make install" gets an additional argument "prefix=/var/foo/usr"
> (where "/var/foo" is some temporary place and "/usr" is what was stated in
> the configure stage for "--prefix"), so everything gets installed
> below "/var/foo/usr". After so
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> >> $ ls compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace*
> >> compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.bat
> >> compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.exe
> >
> >Ah, this could well be the source of the problem; you should only have
> >ghc-inpl
On Sunday 26 August 2007 15:56, I wrote:
> GHCBIN and TOPDIROPT in the shell script wrappers for ghc and ghci contain
> the install-time prefix (not the correct build-time one) [...]
Furthermore, the package.conf is incorrect, too, as I just found out. :-(
Cheers,
S.
On Sunday 26 August 2007 15:29, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Exactly which paths are getting baked in where?
>
> If it's the libraries causing problems then I think we need to set a
> CopyDest in installPackage.hs.
GHCBIN and TOPDIROPT in the shell script wrappers for ghc and ghci contain the
install-time
$ ls compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace*
compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.bat
compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.exe
Ah, this could well be the source of the problem; you should only have
ghc-inplace.exe. Does removing the others fix it?
i changed the Makefile to pass the .e
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:38:27PM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> I'm currently trying to resurrect ghc.spec.in after all those build system
> changes in the last few months. One thing I'm currently fighting with is the
> totally obscure non-standard logic regarding the handling of build/install
> p
I'm currently trying to resurrect ghc.spec.in after all those build system
changes in the last few months. One thing I'm currently fighting with is the
totally obscure non-standard logic regarding the handling of build/install
prefixes. Just to recap what is needed for sane (non-relocatable) RPM
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 01:05:53PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> note that there are no fewer than three versions of
> ghc-inplace:
>
>$ ls compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace*
>compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.bat
>compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.exe
Ah, this could w
Setup.exe: ghc version >=6.2 is required but the version of
..\..\compiler\stage1\ghc-inplace could not be determined.
What do
compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -v --version
compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -v --numeric-version
say?
$ compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -v --version
Using c:/fptools/
Sun Aug 26 02:30:26 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Synched GHC's .spec file with recent changes
Fixed hsc2hs handling and added hpc binary. Explicitly generate Cabal docs.
Note that the Haddock documentation is currently not in the right place,
this needs more investigation, but at least we
20 matches
Mail list logo
