Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
(cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /playpen/ghc/nightly/HEAD-cam-02-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx
Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Sat Aug 11 19:30:00 BST 2007.
checki
Clemens Fruhwirth wrote:
At Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:00:47 +0200,
Thorkil Naur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Running validate on a PPC Mac OS X with the current (2007-08-11) HEAD
produces:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sat Aug 11 15:23:58 CEST 2007
1842 total tests, which gave
Isaac Dupree wrote:
Second includes FastString and FiniteMap changes above the first (that's
what builds I have convenient now)... and I'm just using the stage1,
which will certainly have some effect on the results (similar effect on
both)
first:
40,328 bytes allocated in the heap
1
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:43:18PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Of course I can test other patch combinations at approximately 15 minutes
> each (to rebuild GHC+libs... maybe that can be shortened by taking some
> shortcuts. Certainly if the changes aren't supposed to change ghc's
> behavior _at
BTW, I wish I could put my performance test results in the patch
descriptions, but I generally record the patches before testing them so
that I can easily test just those patches, combine, whatever darcs lets
me do. Maybe I should re-record them I don't like doing that
though, and amend-re
Simon Marlow wrote:
This is certainly a useful test, but I use a slightly different method
to check for performance regressions when I'm trying small modifications
to the compiler. This isn't as foolproof, but in some ways it's more
sensitive and it's deterministic.
Okay, allocations are a r
Isaac Dupree wrote:
The procedure I am about to describe, should make me notice serious
performance regressions in the compiled stage1. Also it tells me when
my patches don't break validate any *more* than an unpatched HEAD
(***which is true currently, that validate is slightly broken for me
At Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:00:47 +0200,
Thorkil Naur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Running validate on a PPC Mac OS X with the current (2007-08-11) HEAD
> produces:
>
> > OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sat Aug 11 15:23:58 CEST 2007
> > 1842 total tests, which gave rise to
>
Mon Aug 6 17:12:48 PDT 2007 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* more cmpFS refactoring
M ./compiler/utils/FastString.lhs -9 +11
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Mon Aug 6 16:52:43 PDT 2007 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* use 'compare' when using the law of trichotomy
M ./compiler/utils/FastString.lhs -6 +4
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Mon Aug 6 16:44:28 PDT 2007 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* use {-# UNPACK #-} !Int rather than explicit Int# (#1405)
M ./compiler/utils/FiniteMap.lhs -26 +15
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinf
Hello,
Running validate on a PPC Mac OS X with the current (2007-08-11) HEAD
produces:
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sat Aug 11 15:23:58 CEST 2007
> 1842 total tests, which gave rise to
> 7193 test cases, of which
>0 caused framework failures
> 5643 were skipped
>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:12:48PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> To be precise, this is what I'm getting from validate on x86 linux with
> current HEAD, in case it matters.
I've fixed these.
Thanks
Ian
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http
Build results:
x86-64 Linux head: lost
x86 Windows head: fail (failed boottestsuite runtestsuite nofib.boot.0
nofib.boot.0_2 nofib.boot.0_3 nofib.boot.0_4 nofib.boot.0_5) fail (failed
stage3 boottestsuite runtestsuite nofib.boot.0 nofib.boot.0_2 nofib.boot.0_3
nofib.boot.0_4 nof
14 matches
Mail list logo
