[nightly] 02-Apr-2007 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2007-04-02 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/ghc/nightly/HEAD-cam-02-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Mon Apr 2 19:30:00 BST 2007. checkin

[nightly] 02-Apr-2007 build of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)

2007-04-02 Thread GHC Build Reports
Build description = 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-linux (cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com) Build location= /playpen/ghc/nightly/STABLE-cam-02-unx Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-6.6-cam-02-unx Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Mon Apr 2 19:00:01 BST 2007.

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sven.panne: > On Monday 02 April 2007 15:44, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > Done (although with some reluctance due to the general network slowness > > of darcs.haskell.org). In the new darcs-all, I am very keen to retain > > the ability to use package repos stored elsewhere (not at > > darcs.haskell.

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
Malcolm.Wallace: > Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Malcolm: Could you move the polyparse repository from > > http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/polyparse to > > darcs.haskell.org/packages, please? This would make things more > > consistent. > > Done (although with some reluctance

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
On Monday 02 April 2007 15:44, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > Done (although with some reluctance due to the general network slowness > of darcs.haskell.org). In the new darcs-all, I am very keen to retain > the ability to use package repos stored elsewhere (not at > darcs.haskell.org). Thanks, that wa

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Malcolm: Could you move the polyparse repository from > http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/polyparse to > darcs.haskell.org/packages, please? This would make things more > consistent. Done (although with some reluctance due to the general network slowne

Running darcs concurrently

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
While we are at the darcs topic: I get problems most of the time I run several "darcs pull" commands for the same server, but different repositories on that server via SSH (cryptic messages about not being able to get some patches etc.). Somehow darcs seems to share the SSH ControlPath (see Ext

[nightly] 02-Apr-2007 build of of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling)

2007-04-02 Thread sof
From: GHC Build Reports <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org Subject: [nightly] 02-Apr-2007 build of of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling) Build description = of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling) Build location= /fptools/builds/STABLE Build config file = /fptools/buil

Re: --partial or --complete?

2007-04-02 Thread Simon Marlow
Sven Panne wrote: Quick question: GHC's current darcs-all adds --partial by default, and the user has to override this with --complete if this is wanted. Given my sometimes rather strange experiences with partial repos (darcs doesn't find a patch, "darcs changes" is silent, etc.), I've switched

--partial or --complete?

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
Quick question: GHC's current darcs-all adds --partial by default, and the user has to override this with --complete if this is wanted. Given my sometimes rather strange experiences with partial repos (darcs doesn't find a patch, "darcs changes" is silent, etc.), I've switched to --complete for

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sven.panne: > On Monday 02 April 2007 13:51, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > [...] > > nhc does use a base containing ByteString *but* it needed a couple of > > tweaks to compile. Those nhc patches are in the darcs repo, but not in > > the standard base yet. > > > > They will be on the next merge.

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
On Monday 02 April 2007 13:51, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > [...] > nhc does use a base containing ByteString *but* it needed a couple of > tweaks to compile. Those nhc patches are in the darcs repo, but not in > the standard base yet. > > They will be on the next merge. [...] Could you merge jus

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sven.panne: > On Monday 02 April 2007 13:23, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > [...] > > The other compilers should be using a base package with fps in it, as > > hugs and ghc do. > > > > fps as a package only exists as a seperate darcs repo for those systems > > that don't have bytestrings in base.

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
On Monday 02 April 2007 13:23, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > [...] > The other compilers should be using a base package with fps in it, as > hugs and ghc do. > > fps as a package only exists as a seperate darcs repo for those systems > that don't have bytestrings in base. I.e. older GHC's, and nhc

Re: Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sven.panne: > I'm currently trying to unify the darcs-all scripts for GHC/Hugs/nhc, adding > a "--release" option on the way, which is inteded to retrieve fixed versions > from Hackage instead of the latest & greatest stuff from darcs repos. Looking > at nhc's package list, I found a few issues:

Package versioning confusion

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
I'm currently trying to unify the darcs-all scripts for GHC/Hugs/nhc, adding a "--release" option on the way, which is inteded to retrieve fixed versions from Hackage instead of the latest & greatest stuff from darcs repos. Looking at nhc's package list, I found a few issues: * Iavor's package

Re: darcs performance

2007-04-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sven.panne: > On Monday 02 April 2007 10:07, Simon Marlow wrote: > > Since we're all demonstrating our local darcs hacks, here's mine: I use > > HTTP for get/pull, and I have a script (attached) that grovels in > > _darcs/prefs/repos to find the right place to push to and then pushes over > > SSH.

Re: darcs performance

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
On Monday 02 April 2007 10:07, Simon Marlow wrote: > Since we're all demonstrating our local darcs hacks, here's mine: I use > HTTP for get/pull, and I have a script (attached) that grovels in > _darcs/prefs/repos to find the right place to push to and then pushes over > SSH. So what I seem to rea

Re: patch applied (hugs98): Added a shiny new unified darcs-all script

2007-04-02 Thread Sven Panne
On Monday 02 April 2007 10:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Is it documented somewhere? Thorough documentation multiplies the user > base! I'm quite aware of that, but the script is not 100% finished yet. Anyway, we will need *all* packages on Hackage for "release" checkouts, but there are curre

[nightly] 01-Apr-2007 build of of HEAD on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling)

2007-04-02 Thread sof
From: GHC Build Reports <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org Subject: [nightly] 01-Apr-2007 build of of HEAD on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling) Build description = of HEAD on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling) Build location= /fptools/builds/HEAD Build config file = /fptools/builds/ghc-nightly/

Re: darcs performance

2007-04-02 Thread Simon Marlow
Ian Lynagh wrote: On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:23:32PM +0200, Sven Panne wrote: When getting a repo via HTTP, darcs seems to be *much* faster than via SSH. Here as an example the cpphs repo, 3.7 patches per second vs. 0.7 patches per second (almost unusable for large/old repos): 5. :-( Is there

patch applied (ghc): Make type-tidying work for coercion variables

2007-04-02 Thread Simon Peyton Jones
Mon Apr 2 00:38:35 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Make type-tidying work for coercion variables When tidying a TyVar binder, we must tidy its kind if it's a coercion variable! I had forgotten to do this, which is a serious bug. As a result some more complicated programs were getting a

Daily report for 6.6

2007-04-02 Thread BuildBot Collator
New unexpected test passes: barton-mangler-bug 1 tnaur PPC OSX 6.6 cholewo-eval1 tnaur PPC OSX 6.6 New unexpected test failures: arith0111 tnaur PPC OSX 6.6 barton-mangler-bug 1 tnaur PPC OSX 6.6 concprog001 1 tnaur PPC OSX 6.6 concprog0

Daily report for head

2007-04-02 Thread BuildBot Collator
Old unexpected test passes: arith0081 x86 Windows head barton-mangler-bug 2 macgyver PPC OSX head cholewo-eval3 x86 Windows head New unexpected test failures: cg035 1 x86 Windows head rand001 1 x86 Windows head fast read001