On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:06:02 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you help to review this simple patch?
> Some index check in Byte/ShortVector.fromArray/fromArray0Template seems not
> necessary, could be removed.
> Thanks
The intrinsic implementation will not perform bounds checks. I think what yo
> On Jun 13, 2024, at 8:20 AM, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
>
>
>
> From: "Viktor Klang"
> To: "Remi Forax" , "core-libs-dev"
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 12:52:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [External] : Gatherer and primitive specialization
> Hi Rémi,
>
> Given that Collector has not been special
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:12:36 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, the java.util.Formatter$Conversion::isValid method is implemented
>> based on switch, which cannot be inlined because codeSize > 325. This
>> problem can be avoided by implementing it with ImmutableBitSetPredicate.
>>
>> use `-
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:46:49 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, the java.util.Formatter$Conversion::isValid method is implemented
>> based on switch, which cannot be inlined because codeSize > 325. This
>> problem can be avoided by implementing it with ImmutableBitSetPredicate.
>>
>> use `-
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 11:49:39 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> This PR improves the test failure output for the failing test case, and the
> underlying issue is likely going to be addressed by
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/19131 /cc @DougLea
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
-
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:43:05 GMT, Hannes Greule wrote:
> Similar to how `MethodHandle#invoke(Exact)` methods are already handled, this
> change adds special casing for `VarHandle.{access-mode}` methods.
>
> The exception message is less exact, but I think that's acceptable.
src/hotspot/share/pr
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 06:57:28 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support
> for following new two vector permutation APIs.
>
>
> Declaration:-
> Vector.selectFrom(Vector v1, Vector v2)
>
>
> Semantics:-
> Using in
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:20:06 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support
>> following new vector operators.
>>
>>
>> . SATURATING_UADD : Saturating unsigned addition.
>> . SATURATING_ADD: Saturating sig
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:42:44 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support
>> for following new two vector permutation APIs.
>>
>>
>> Declaration:-
>> Vector.selectFrom(Vector v1, Vector v2)
>>
>>
>> Semantics:-
>>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 06:09:48 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support
>> for following new two vector permutation APIs.
>>
>>
>> Declaration:-
>> Vector.selectFrom(Vector v1, Vector v2)
>>
>>
>> Semantics:-
>>
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:24:15 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR fixes two minor issues in the `MemoryLayout` javadoc:
>> * the section describing dereference path talks about `P` and `P'` but then
>> only uses `P` in the code;
>> * the `ceilDiv` math on the `PathElement::sequenceElement
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:26:58 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> When working on startup improvements, I noticed that the method handle
> returned by `MemoryLayout::offsetHandle` can overflow if the client calls the
> handle with a base offset that is too big.
>
> In other similar situations, t
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:58:44 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support
>> for following new two vector permutation APIs.
>>
>>
>> Declaration:-
>> Vector.selectFrom(Vector v1, Vector v2)
>>
>>
>> Semantics:-
>>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:38:46 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> The performance of the `MemorySegment::fil` can be improved by replacing the
>> `checkAccess()` method call with calling `checkReadOnly()` instead (as the
>> bounds of the segment itself do not need to be checked).
>>
>> Also, smaller seg
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:10:05 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> The performance of the `MemorySegment::fil` can be improved by replacing the
>> `checkAccess()` method call with calling `checkReadOnly()` instead (as the
>> bounds of the segment itself do not need to be checked).
>>
>> Also, smaller seg
That looks reasonable.
Thinking a little more broadly.
We could also change Collections.shuffle(List) to use ThreadLocalRandom so it
does not have to cache the Random instance, plus it has better concurrent and
PRNG properties. The spec does not describe the precise details of randomness.
It’
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:36:50 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> This JavaDoc change attempts to shine some light on the `combiner`-function
> as it relates to the third variant of `Stream.reduce` since it according to
> the bug submission in JBS can be confusing that the `combiner` is not
> mentioned
On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:24:40 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While the floating-point == operation is *not* an equivalence relation,
>> there are useful equivalence relations that can be defined over
>> floating-point values. Text is added to java.lang.Double to discuss and name
>> those relations.
>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 05:26:08 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Double.java line 166:
>>
>>> 164: * equivalence relation for {@code double} values {@code a} and {@code
>>> b} is
>>> 165: * implemented by the expression
>>> 166: * {@code Double.doubleTo}Raw{@code
>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:56:21 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While the floating-point == operation is *not* an equivalence relation,
>> there are useful equivalence relations that can be defined over
>> floating-point values. Text is added to java.lang.Double to discuss and name
>> those relations.
>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:00:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 13:24:54 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjdk
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:47:39 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjd
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:55:24 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> JEP 429 implementation.
>
> Andrew Haley has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Javadoc changes.
> - ProblemList.txt cleanup
src/hotspot/share/utilities/exceptions.cpp li
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:55:24 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> JEP 429 implementation.
>
> Andrew Haley has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Javadoc changes.
> - ProblemList.txt cleanup
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:39:19 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> JEP 429 implementation.
>
> Andrew Haley has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 52 commits:
>
> - Merge master
> - javadoc
> - Feedback from reviewers
> - Update
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:27:04 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.concurrent/share/classes/jdk/incubator/concurrent/ScopedValue.java
>> line 209:
>>
>>> 207: final int bitmask;
>>> 208:
>>> 209: private static final Object NIL = new Object();
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:33:06 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjd
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:47:47 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes the introduction of **guarding** of the use of
>> `DirectBuffer::address` within the JDK. With the introduction of the Foreign
>> Function and Memory access, it is possible to derive Buffer instances that
>> are backed by
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:40:58 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes the introduction of **guarding** of the use of
>> `DirectBuffer::address` within the JDK. With the introduction of the Foreign
>> Function and Memory access, it is possible to derive Buffer instances that
>> are backed by
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:15:42 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> Please review a simple change to hide internal classes in generated
> documentation by adding doc comments containing a `@hidden` tag. I verified
> the fix by making sure `grep -r jdk.internal` returns no matches in the
> generated do
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:16:38 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The implementation of Thread.yield for virtual threads is currently a "lazy
> submit". This means the task for the virtual thread is queued to the
> carrier/worker local queue without signalling other threads. This behavior
> can be surpri
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:28:17 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> This `noreg-doc` PR has been moved over from the mainline repository, the
> original PR is openjdk/jdk#11163.
>
> The purpose is to hide internal classes in generated documentation by adding
> doc comments containing a @hidden tag. I
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:14:38 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> `VarHandles.getStaticFieldFromBaseAndOffset` maps a base/offset/fieldType to
> a static `Field`. It's fragile to assume that the location of a static
> field returned by `Unsafe.staticFieldBase` is a Class object.This changes
> the V
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 23:34:04 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> `VarHandles.getStaticFieldFromBaseAndOffset` maps a base/offset/fieldType to
>> a static `Field`. It's fragile to assume that the location of a static
>> field returned by `Unsafe.staticFieldBase` is a Class object.This
>> changes t
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:45:46 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> `java/lang/invoke/VarHandles` tests run with C1, C2 and tiered compilations
>> and the test cases are executed in the warm up loop with 2 iterations to
>> verify C1, C2 intrinsics. Default Tier4CompileThreshold is 15000.
>>
>> This P
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:03:59 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Currently, a `Lookup` object with `PACKAGE` access can be used to inject a
> class in the runtime package of the Lookup's lookup class via
> `Lookup::defineClass`. The classes that are injected have the same access
> as other members in
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:27:36 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Currently, a `Lookup` object with `PACKAGE` access can be used to inject a
>> class in the runtime package of the Lookup's lookup class via
>> `Lookup::defineClass`. The classes that are injected have the same access
>> as other members
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:56:22 GMT, Glavo wrote:
> When the default Locale is tr, the letter `i` will be converted to `İ`
> (U+0130) by `toUpperCase()`. This causes the assertion to fail.
Looks good. I am grateful the assert was in place.
-
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:20:42 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Currently, a `Lookup` object with `PACKAGE` access can be used to inject a
>> class in the runtime package of the Lookup's lookup class via
>> `Lookup::defineClass`. The classes that are injected have the same access
>> as other members
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:13:10 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> The Vector API `"indexInRange(int offset, int limit)"` is used
>> to compute a vector mask whose lanes are set to true if the
>> index of the lane is inside the range specified by the `"offset"`
>> and `"limit"` arguments, otherwise the lan
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:51:19 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> The Vector API `"indexInRange(int offset, int limit)"` is used
>> to compute a vector mask whose lanes are set to true if the
>> index of the lane is inside the range specified by the `"offset"`
>> and `"limit"` arguments, otherwise the lan
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:35:52 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> I overlooked in the fix for JDK-8297757 that it should have passed the
> declaring class of the static fields rather than the reference class passed
> to `Lookup::findStaticVarHandle`.
Doh! I think the previous fix may have also result in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:35:52 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> I overlooked in the fix for JDK-8297757 that it should have passed the
> declaring class of the static fields rather than the reference class passed
> to `Lookup::findStaticVarHandle`.
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
---
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:57:58 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> I noticed when looking at the code that there was no real need to use a CHM
> to perform the tracking of activation in an ordered fashion on
> ForEachOrderedTask, but instead a VarHandle can be used, reducing allocations
> and indirection
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:44:35 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/ForEachOps.java line 431:
>>
>>> 429: // leftChild and rightChild were just created and not
>>> fork():ed
>>> 430: // yet so no need for a volatile write
>>> 431
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> I noticed when looking at the code that there was no real need to use a CHM
>> to perform the tracking of activation in an ordered fashion on
>> ForEachOrderedTask, but instead a VarHandle can be used, reducing
>> allocations and indirec
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:09:37 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> I noticed when looking at the code that there was no real need to use a CHM
>> to perform the tracking of activation in an ordered fashion on
>> ForEachOrderedTask, but instead a VarHandle can be used, reducing
>> allocations and indirec
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:08:29 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> This PR suggests we add a vectorized equalsIgnoreCase benchmark to the set
>> of benchmarks in `org.openjdk.bench.jdk.incubator.vector`. This benchmark
>> serves as an example of how vectorization can be useful also in the area of
>> t
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:28:55 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> This PR suggests we add a vectorized equalsIgnoreCase benchmark to the set
>> of benchmarks in `org.openjdk.bench.jdk.incubator.vector`. This benchmark
>> serves as an example of how vectorization can be useful also in the area of
>> te
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:48:46 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> This PR suggests we add a vectorized equalsIgnoreCase benchmark to the set
>> of benchmarks in `org.openjdk.bench.jdk.incubator.vector`. This benchmark
>> serves as an example of how vectorization can be useful also in the area of
>> te
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:00:14 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/attribute/StackMapTableAttribute.java
>> line 68:
>>
>>> 66: * A simple stack value.
>>> 67: */
>>> 68: public enum SimpleVerificationTypeInfo implements
>>> VerificationType
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:50:07 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Actually, we also have a ClassfileVersion class, so that could be a better
>> place for version numbers?
>
> There were several iterations of "where to store numeric constants".
> It is hard to find them when spread across many classes and d
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:00:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:53:14 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/ForEachOps.java line 513:
>>
>>> 511: // of right subtree (if any, which can be this task's
>>> right sibling)
>>> 512: //
>>> 513: var leftDescendant = (For
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:29:13 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> I had the same observation as Maurizio.
>
> I've extracted `StackMapFrameInfo` to the top level and moved
> `VerificationTypeInfo`, however it is still nested.
> Let me know if you think we should really avoid all nested or if info inside
>
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:12:21 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/instruction/ConstantInstruction.java
>> line 63:
>>
>>> 61: * aload_0}).
>>> 62: */
>>> 63: sealed interface IntrinsicConstantInstruction extends
>>> ConstantInstruction
>>
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:31:06 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:50:33 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/instruction/NewMultiArrayInstruction.java
>> line 60:
>>
>>> 58: static NewMultiArrayInstruction of(ClassEntry arrayTypeEntry,
>>> 59:int dimensi
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:39:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
>> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>>
>> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
>> and transforming
>> ([JDK-8294957](https://bug
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
