Re: [External] : Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

> On Sep 7, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Alexander Matveev > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > I file following issue for this: > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293462 > > > Yes, you right it is related to JDK-8289030. I put suggested workaround to > https

Re: [External] : Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

Hi Michael, I file following issue for this: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293462 Yes, you right it is related to JDK-8289030. I put suggested workaround to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293462 in comment section. There are two possible workarounds: 1) Generate signed application

Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

> On Sep 6, 2022, at 8:00 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > > > >> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:52 PM, Michael Hall wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Alexander Matveev >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Did you generate application image with same JDK version (19+36-2238)? With >>>

Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:52 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > > > >> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Alexander Matveev >> wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Did you generate application image with same JDK version (19+36-2238)? With >> latest JDK version .jpackage.xml file should be present. We do not su

Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:52 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > > > >> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Alexander Matveev >> wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Did you generate application image with same JDK version (19+36-2238)? With >> latest JDK version .jpackage.xml file should be present. We do not sup

Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Alexander Matveev > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Did you generate application image with same JDK version (19+36-2238)? With > latest JDK version .jpackage.xml file should be present. We do not support > signing of application images generate by another versions

Re: jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

Hi Michael, Did you generate application image with same JDK version (19+36-2238)? With latest JDK version .jpackage.xml file should be present. We do not support signing of application images generate by another versions of JDK. It should be same JDK. Thanks, Alexander > On Sep 5, 2022, at 4

jpackage OS/X --app-image signing

The 19 release candidate appears to have new issues on this? java --version openjdk 19 2022-09-20 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 19+36-2238) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 19+36-2238, mixed mode, sharing) which jpackage jpackage: aliased to /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-19.jdk/Conte