On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:01:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
>> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
>
> lgtm
> @RogerRiggs, @minborg, @naotoj, thanks for the reviews. I've attached
> successful `tier1,2` results to the ticket. I'd ap
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:01:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
>> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
>
> lgtm
@RogerRiggs, @minborg, @naotoj, thanks for the reviews. I've attached
successful `tier1,2` results to the ticket. I'd apprec
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 06:46:07 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
@vy
Your change (at version 891d9ada7ce6860ea8e1253021f04053cc27090a) is now ready
to be sponsored by a Committer.
-
P
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 06:46:07 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
There is a place in java.util.Locale::hashCode that can also be changed
Current version
long bitsWeight = Double.doubleToLongBits(wei
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 06:46:07 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
LGTM. Thanks for the refactoring
-
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 06:46:07 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
Looks fine! Thanks for this cleanup.
-
Marked as reviewed by pminborg (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jd
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 06:46:07 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
> Replace manual bitwise operations in `hashCode` implementations of
> `java.time` with `Long::hashCode`.
lgtm
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24959#pullrequestreview-280
