On Wed, 7 May 2025 12:56:20 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> I guess a better approach may be to allow periodical reminders if a thread
> gets no reply - many of us gets quite a few hundred mails every day on
> workdays.
I think it is time to move this discussion into its own thread, but just a last
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:21:41 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
>> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
>> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
>> non-synchronized Writer implementatio
On Tue, 6 May 2025 21:54:59 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> We must remember that the OpenJDK community is built by individuals with
> different backgrounds and motivations to engaging. Some people get paid to
> work on OpenJDK development, others do it in their own time. It would be next
>
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:21:41 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
>> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
>> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
>> non-synchronized Writer implementatio
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:21:41 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
>> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
>> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
>> non-synchronized Writer implementatio
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:21:41 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
>> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
>> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
>> non-synchronized Writer implementatio
On Sun, 4 May 2025 20:36:07 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> In this situation, how can we ensure a renewed discussion will actually
> attract attention? I think our guide should suggest a solution to this, like
> "prmopting a thread after 2 weeks of no reply"?
The mailing list is the right place to g
On Sun, 4 May 2025 18:39:24 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> start a discussion on core-libs-dev
Threads about this topic have been started multiple times but failed to attract
any attention on this topic, not even a rejection:
-
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2024-December/thread.
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:21:41 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
>> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
>> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
>> non-synchronized Writer implementatio
On Sun, 4 May 2025 14:49:35 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> ...you can start drafting a CSR like that for `getChars` for `CharSequence`.
Done. Kindly asking your review for the CSR:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356123.
> One concern is that (See `HashMap.newHashMap` vs `HashMap.of`)
> `XxxWr
> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
> non-synchronized Writer implementation optimized for writing into
> `StringBuilder`.
>
> A ba
On Sun, 4 May 2025 14:52:39 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Undone copyright update of otherwise unchanged file.
>> - Update Of.java
>>
>>Applied changnes proposed by @liac
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:36:29 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
> non-synchronized Writer implementation op
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:36:29 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
> non-synchronized Writer implementation op
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:36:29 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
> non-synchronized Writer implementation op
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:36:29 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8353795](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353795): Adding the new
> method `public static Writer Writer.of(StringBuilder)`, providing a
> non-synchronized Writer implementation op
16 matches
Mail list logo
