On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 19:40:40 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>
> Feeling stupid for asking this, but does it make any sense to keep the order
> of modifiers "blessed" in text and tests?
>
> public protected private abstract static final transient volatile
> synchronized native strictfp
Will addre
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:12:56 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
>> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
>> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
>> support
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:12:56 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
>> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
>> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
>> support
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:12:56 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
>> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
>> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
>> support
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:12:56 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
>> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
>> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
>> support
> Update the spec of Class.getModifiers to match long-standing behavior for
> primitive and array classes. Remove unneeded implementation flexibility with
> regard to setting other bit positions. This work was prompted to better
> support anticipated future Valhalla changes.
>
> Please also rev
