> The `class` file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because
> size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all
> contents, creating malformed `class` files. Almost all scenarios where such
> oversized lists are created can be considered an error; we s
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:01:18 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> The `class` file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because
> size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all
> contents, creating malformed `class` files. Almost all scenarios where such
> oversi
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:01:18 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> The `class` file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because
> size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all
> contents, creating malformed `class` files. Almost all scenarios where such
> oversi
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:25:40 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> The `class` file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because
>> size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all
>> contents, creating malformed `class` files. Almost all scenarios where such
>> ov
The `class` file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because
size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all
contents, creating malformed `class` files. Almost all scenarios where such
oversized lists are created can be considered an error; we should ea
