On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:02:27 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImage
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:02:27 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImage
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:27:16 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Oddly while the status at the bottom of the conversation says it has "2
> approvals", the tickbox:
>
> ```
> Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1
> Reviewer, 1 Author
> ```
>
> is not checked. I can try
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 06:03:28 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Debatable. It's obviously going to scale any results somewhat based on the
>> size of the resources and number of classes. It's kind nice to see "this
>> change removes at least N micro/milli seconds of time spent" since that's a
>> mini
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 16:50:09 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/jdk/internal/jrtfs/ImageReaderBenchmark.java
>> line 230:
>>
>>> 228: // Created by running "java -verbose:class", throwing away
>>> anonymous inner
>>> 229: // classes and anything without a reliabl
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:02:27 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImage
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:02:27 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImage
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
> Units
> NewImageBenchmark.warmCache_CountAllNodes avgt5 0.785 ± 0.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 07:25:35 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Some tidying up relating to the state objects.
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/jdk/internal/jrtfs/ImageReaderBenchmar
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:08:25 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImag
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:08:25 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImag
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
> Units
> NewImageBenchmark.warmCache_CountAllNodes avgt5 0.785 ± 0.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:18:19 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
>> Units
>> NewImag
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
> Units
> NewImageBenchmark.warmCache_CountAllNodes avgt5 0.785 ± 0.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:27:40 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
> Units
> NewImageBenchma
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:27:40 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
> Units
> NewImageBenchma
Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of ImageReader
performance.
Current results on my laptop:
Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
Units
NewImageBenchmark.warmCache_CountAllNodes avgt5 0.785 ± 0.140
ms/op
NewI
17 matches
Mail list logo
