Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:49:17 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with >> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revisio

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:49:17 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with >> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revisio

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Doug Lea
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:00:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/SubmissionPublisher.java > lin

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:49:17 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with >> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revisio

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:50:08 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater.java >> line 86: >> >>> 84: * } >>> 85: * // ... and so on >>> 86: * }} >> >> I wonder if this should be convert to a `{@snippet ..}` and have it hand

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:49:17 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with >> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revisio

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Doug Lea
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:39:05 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/CompletionStage.java line > 15

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Doug Lea
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:10:42 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/TimeUnit.java line 402: > >> 4

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Doug Lea
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:47:43 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ScheduledExecutorService.java >

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:51:35 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> @pavelrappo Indeed, "Reactive Streams" would be better. Perhaps something >> like this: >> >> Suggestion: >> >> * fully conform to the Reactive Streams specification. > > Thanks; done. Nit of a nit: would it make sense to also change "reac

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:49:17 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with >> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revisio

Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8]

2025-06-19 Thread Doug Lea
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with > documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements -